We're an educational resource concerned with the diffusion of knowledge. They are primary researchers that will publish their data and conclusion with an open license, thus adding to the "sum of all knowledge". I think those objectives are eminently compatible.
Which is a reasonable response; and I'd probably agree with you.
Although it does lead to another question; a lot of studies are conducted around the world, many of them would benefit dramatically from publicity on a "top-5" website. How far does supporting those that ask go?
What sort of precedent does it set?
Were Berkman given preference here for some as-yet-unknown reason (as is being suggested).
The latter point could be fairly damaging to our credibility.
Again; issues that should really be worked out in advance?
Tom