Frankly - if you don't want your IP address to appear on the block log, then don't break the rules by using sockpuppets to circumvent a ban.
I'm sorry Waerth, but from all I've read here - you are the one in the wrong. Checking where the sockpuppets were coming from, and blocking the address shown, are normal and correct.
(And this is a local issue, I think it should go to local mailing lists now)
--sannse
Erik van den Muijzenberg wrote:
On 16-jun-2006, at 15:35, Jan Kulveit wrote:
As I understand it, the core of the complain may be in the fact, Waerths ip address was effectively released public, as it appeareed in block log.
From the circumstances and whois record showing its in Thailnd,
outside observer can associate the revealed ip and Waerth (yes, with some level of doubt).
Ironically, if Waerth had not complained, nobody would have known it was his IP-address. After all it was just a Thailand-based IP-address. Nobody could know for sure it was Waerths.
+++Muijz
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l