On 29 November 2011 12:56, Tobias Oelgarte tobias.oelgarte@googlemail.com wrote:
... And I still want to see the "good reason for doing so". So far i could not find one single reason that was worthy to implement such a filter considering all the drawbacks it causes. That doesn't mean that
Yes.
The Board voted unanimously *twice* for the filter. They need to individually reveal their reasoning and what convinced them so strongly - the second time in the face of the threat of the second-largest project forking.
Really. You just haven't told us what you each personally find so compelling about the idea, and we can't see it. So people presume there's financial influence or some other reason going on.
Board, if you want this problem to go away, you need to explain yourselves, in a way that actually answers detractors. Your reasoning is really not obvious.
- d.