On 17/09/2013 03:33, Risker wrote:
I am not certain that neutral point of view applies to all Wikimedia projects. Wikiversity programs may deliberately examine one aspect of a subject while ignoring others, for example. It is difficult to apply the concept of "neutrality" to images and other media, some of which is explicitly non-neutral (see the Jyllands-Posten Muhammed images). I am not sure that "neutral point of view" applies to Wiktionary at all.
"Wikipedia https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikipedia, Wiktionary https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wiktionary, Wikibooks https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikibooks, Wikiquote https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikiquote, Wikisource https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikisource and Wikinews https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikinews – but not Wikiversity https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikiversity, Wikivoyage https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikivoyage, Wikispecies https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikispecies, Wikimedia Commons https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia_Commons, the many "backstage" projects https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Template:Main_Page/Sisterprojects, or Meta https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Meta:About – have a strict *neutral point of view* (NPOV) policy." -- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Neutral_point_of_view