Hi Yana,
That's a good change - thanks for making it. :-) Out of curiosity, is there a reason why you're using v3 rather than v4 of the license?
Thanks, Mike
On 19 Mar 2014, at 19:46, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi all,
We've started changing the copyright status for the Wikibooks logo on Commons to CC BY-SA 3.0:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikibooks-logo-en-noslogan.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikibooks-logo.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikibooks-logo-en.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikibooks-logo-en-unpathed.svg
I would really appreciate your help if you would like to replace the copyright template with the CC BY-SA 3.0 template on the different language versions of the Wikibooks logo.
But please don't change the copyright status on any of the other Wikimedia logos for now. We're still working on those.
Thanks, Yana
-- Yana Welinder Legal Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867
NOTICE: For legal reasons, I may only serve as a lawyer for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Yana Welinder ywelinder@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Hi Rupert,
Some Wikimedia logos are not currently under a free license for historic reasons. But we hope to make them all freely licensed eventually and have already done so for newer logos (e.g. the new Wikivoyage logo).
Thanks, Yana
-- Yana Welinder Legal Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6867
NOTICE: For legal reasons, I may only serve as a lawyer for the Wikimedia Foundation. This means I may not give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:58 PM, rupert THURNER rupert.thurner@gmail.comwrote:
hi,
i talked to james about the reasoning. it seems unequal that wikimedia's logo is restricted and allowed, the partners logo not. imo we should put the wikimedia logo's under a standard license, because the wikimedia foundation is giving a bad example without gaining a lot.
rupert.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 6:07 AM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Currently our policies do not allow the use of logos of organizations we are collaborating with, even with permission from these organizations,
in
the non mainspace areas of Wikipedia where we are collaborating.
As this use "with permission" is legal, it is not in mainspace, and it promotes the development of Wikipedia I have started a RfC here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content#Logos_of_organ...
that we allow it. Thoughts?
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe