On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Michael Snow wikipedia@frontier.com wrote:
No, K. Peachey avoided citing actions by not "debating the whole wording thing" that would establish what the action entailed, offering instead a generic description of criminal law that would encourage people, in passive-aggressive style, to "draw their own conclusions" about the supposed criminality involved. I can't tell whether K. Peachey believed the actions in question would be in violation of the law or not.
--Michael Snow
No, I decided not to start debating yet again in this thread since it's already been discussed weather or not we should have falsely worded banners, and I'm sure there are other people than my self that are more than happy to have such a discussion where I would prefer not to.
What I did do was point out possible side effects for chapters should these banners be ran in their areas using Australia as a example since being a resident here, I have a some what limited knowledge on our laws, Which from previous discussions on WMF mailing lists previously and elsewhere, I have a understanding most places have similar ones in place.
And as such believed that was very relevant to the subject being discussed at hand. -p858snake/peachey