It's already been made clear that the foundation has no obligation to consult the community on this issue. My interpretation of Michael's post is that he is restating this point. They are *going* to make the switch, and when they do we will be bound by what the CC-BY-SA says attribution is. We take it on good faith that the foundation will work with cc (and that the cc will work with the foundation..) to come up with an interpretation of the attribution requirements that is more or less consistent with the vote. But there is no need to hold a vote now since they have already decided to make the switch.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/18 Michael Snow wikipedia@verizon.net:
That's why we made it a point to include some attribution standards in the proposal, so that we don't vote on this in a vacuum.
I don't believe I've seen a formal proposal yet - did I miss it?
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l