On 7/20/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/20/06, Anthere Anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
PS : is it a good idea to have a user named ombudsman ?
The issue has been raised from time to time (I think it got a mention in the user's RFC). Since the user has refused to change there hasn't really been much that can be done.
Wait, a bureaucrat doesn't really need the user's approval to do the name change... On dewp, there is now a policy which allows bureaucrats to do forced name changes for offending usernames ("User:XYZ_is_an_idiot"). I'm not saying that "Ombudsman" is literally offending but it might be considered if the user constantly refuses and if consensus is reached that his username could be misleading. Michael
-- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l