On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 16:51, Nicole Ebber nicole.ebber@wikimedia.de wrote:
This is a process for all of us to shape our shared future, together; let’s keep engaging and challenging one another in this same spirit.
Perhaps it would also be in keeping with that spirit for this:
Q4a. Could this Recommendation have a negative impact/change?
All change has negative connotations to some members of the community
to be re-written, to actually reflect the proposal's real and significant risks?
As it stands, I do not find it to be "solution-oriented", nor indicative of "due review and reflection", nor "in the spirit of collegial collaboration", and I do not think anyone could plausibly argue that it is any of those things.