Gerard Meijssen ha scritto:
Hoi, Having a criterion that is dependent on the English language Wikipedia is not and cannot be seriously considered as a standard. What it considers note worthy is not necessarily relevant from a linguistic or otherwise point of view. Thanks, GerardM
I think a reasonable inclusion criterium would be whether a language with no native speakers is used anyway as a lingua franca to communicate between people of different native languages. This definitely applies to Latin, and I guess it could be applied to Classical Greek. At the end of the day, if the Wiki* in my native language is deficient in the argument I'm interested in, I'll try to read about it in a language I know. I don't know if Classics scholars communicate in Classical Greek if they haven't got any other communal language, but I wouldn't be too surprised.
Cruccone