On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 21:34, Aron Manning aronmanning5@gmail.com wrote: .
The draft already refers to 2 articles (1 https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/us/slave-photographs-harvard.html,2 https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c0043945-852b-4d7e-94ad-1859f91ba418) that explain the need for ND. I'll ask for further sources that show the benefits of NC and ND licensed materials.
Aron
1 refers to images that are public domain in terms of copyright and the latter is mostly talking about trademark or stuff so broad that you couldn't usefuly copyright it in the first place. ND isn't a useful protection in these cases (it might be of some use for current individual artists but they can publish their work elsewhere).