At first thought, this proposal seemed like a "branding suicide", but considering the enormous difference in awareness between Wikipedia and the other brands, it could be a subject worth discussing. It would also help avoid composed word that sometimes sound strange or are just plain weird in languages other than English.
Strainu
2010/12/10 dex2000@pc.dk:
I was about to write a suggestion similar to the one indicated by Ziko van Dijk. I second it and recommend that the following be given serious consideration:
Change as soon as practically possible the naming of the Foundation to the "Wikipedia Foundation" and the naming of the projects to Wikipedia, Wikipedia Commons, Wikipedia Books, Wikipedia Wiktionary etc. That would simplify matters enormously while at the same time broadening the Wikipedia brand to all projects in a much more effective and comprehensible way.
"We" would of course still talk internally about Commons, Wikibooks, Wiktionary and so on for the sake of brevity.
It is never too late...
Regards, Sir48/Thyge, da:wiki
----- Original meddelelse -----
Ziko van Dijk zvandijk@googlemail.com [mailto:zvandijk@googlemail.com] wrote: ....
Whether the names amplify the problem, whether "Wikimedia" was a good name choice - maybe WMF should rename itself "The Wikipedia Foundation" and call Wiktionary "The Wikipedia Dictionary" and so on.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l