On 10-jun-2006, at 2:44, oscar wrote:
- the task of an appointed board should be supervising the work of
the executives, it should be a type of board consisting of very professional people (the kind which in a way of speaking should have "better things to do", if you get my meaning)
I'm sorry, but I don't.
Plus I don't understand why "this whole organization, its projects and mission, its vitality and appeal", would collapse if the separation "between volunteer-work, executive tasks and their respective supervision" would not be implemented as strict as you would like it to be.
, and in general not deal with the projects at all. 4. the council of representatives should supervise the projects, advise the executive level, and in general not deal with the board at all.
Again I don't understand why such a strict separation should be necessary.
i could be more elaborate in explaining the rationale behind these thoughts,
I think that would be a good idea.
So far all you have come up with was "I want a strict separation". You can't convince people if you don't make clear why such a strict separation should be necessary in the first place.
but i chose to keep things concise. note however, that i spoke of how specific tasks, responsibilities and work can be organized,
You mean *should* be organized, in order to prevent a total collapse, right? ("the only way this organization (...) will survive").
IMHO rather strong words and little explanation, Oscar.
Erik vdMb aka Muijz