Guys, please,
The language is just a mere practical matter. Please let's first come to the conclusion what the *purpose* would be of this meta-arbcom *before* we even start with discussing issues like this. i know it is very easy to get into details, but let's remain focussed. Does anyone have a good proposal for which topics the arbcom should be used and what type of members we would need?
BR, Lodewijk
2008/1/5, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com:
On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman hillgentleman.wikiversity@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas Dalton,
Sure, but that can be done case-by-case. I think we both agree that sometimes it is better to use a language other than English.
And that should depend on which "native" language the project is in.
For discussions with the parties, yes, it should be done in whatever language is best for the parties and the committee can worry about translating things. For discussions within the committee, it's quickest and easiest to always use English.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l