How about less provocations, attempts to breakdown the conversation with violence, and support our idea in a civilized manner ? So " it's not good to give publicly comments on the candidates.", why do you think that?
I am not understanding your affirmation, because you did not offer any argument that corroborates to your statement.
On 21 October 2015 at 12:13, Ilario Valdelli valdelli@gmail.com wrote:
The spirit of the Wikimedia Movement I suppose is to be "respectful" of each person.
There is the freedom to be informed, there is the freedom of the opinion but these freedoms have limits and the limits are set where another freedom starts because I think that it's clear that there are other freedoms like the respect of the privacy.
Anyway I suggest you to make your proposal to person in charge of the selection, appointed every time the process starts, may be this person can take your comment in consideration.
Kind regards
On 21.10.2015 15:49, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton wrote:
That's the spirit of Wikimedia Movement, censorship...
I was talking about the list, you said: " it's not good to give publicly comments on the candidates." and I asked why, you decided not answer.
And you know that AffCom screwed WMBR, so don't come with "If you are member of a chapter, please ask internally to your chapter, not to me." just to border me.
-- Ilario Valdelli Wikimedia CH Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera Switzerland - 8008 Zürich Tel: +41764821371 http://www.wikimedia.ch
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe