David Goodman wrote:
There are so many there, that it might be better to do it in a more organized fashion.
On 12/7/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/12/2007, Pedro Sanchez pdsanchez@gmail.com wrote:
There's a wiki, mirroring content from wikipedia without attributing its source, without preserving articles''s history, and without stating the content is GFDL.
Who handles these matters?
http://www.cetratec.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Archivo_binario taken from http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo_binario
as well as everything from http://www.cetratec.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Especial%3AAllpages&fr...
they're copying anything informatics-related from wikipedia, stripping it from source, attrbution and license
see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks
-- geni
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I imagine a lot of these might simply be based on misunderstanding of what the GFDL requires. I recall having a conversation with one editor who was also hosting some Wikipedia articles on his own website. I politely informed him that he was required to have the full text of the GFDL and article history available, or links to it, when the subject came up, he apologized and had the appropriate links on his site the next day. A lot of these may simply be solved by a similar polite notice, especially if the notice were from an official Foundation representative.