The job of the "Community Advocacy" bit of "Legal and Community Advocacy" is, as I understand it, to advocate for the community's need within the Foundation, and act as a conduit to the community for legal stuff.
That department and its predecessors have hired professional attorneys to lobby on copyright and patent issues for several years on multiple continents. Recently they have been active in many other legal advocacy areas including international trade, for example. The process by which those issues was selected has in the past had more to do than what the Board of Trustees could agree on, resulting in a common denominator fare less inclusive than typical volunteer opinions on what is an is not important to them, their families, their local communities, and the factors which determine the time and effort they are able to contribute. Willful ignorance of such factors is not good volunteer recruiting practice.
Their job is not to advocate for "reduction in public school class sizes"....
Is there any reason to think that reduction of public school class sizes is not likely to result in more productive editors, with more time to contribute, or that it would not attract quality volunteers relative to taking no position on the question?