On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:22 AM, Ryan wiki.ral315@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com wrote:
This is the reason the Board election is little more than a popularity contest. Looking at the credentials of those running, Greg is arguably more qualified (in terms of education and relevant experience) than most of those
running.
However, due to the fact that this election _is_ a popularity contest, he is unlikely to win.
Personally, several of the candidates should withdraw, as they have clue
as
to how to manage a non-profit organization. Simply: they have no business there. However, I leave that for the voters to decide.
-Chad
Of course popularity plays into the process; I can't name one actual "election" where popularity is not a motivating factor.
If you really want people to make the voting decision on the candidate's statement *only*.. you should remove the names and replace it with "candidateNo.1, candidateNo.2 etc."...