On 3 May 2016 at 17:34, Gnangarra gnangarra@gmail.com wrote:
We should be careful in not shaming communities to vote poorly to save face, or even vote for people they dont want as some may truly feel that the candidates who have nominated wont be a good representative of the community.
I agree with the first part, but on the second, it's worth noting that "none" is an acceptable vote in this election. For myself I think you'd be hard pressed to find *no* candidates you can support from this round - they seem a pretty good selection - but others no doubt differ :-).
A.