On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:44 PM Oliver Keyes ironholds@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Luis Villa luis@lu.is wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 1:08 PM Antoine Musso hashar+wmf@free.fr
wrote:
To the best of my knowledge such agreements are not public, but honestly there is no conspiracy behind that. There are public clues though:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Access_to_nonpublic_information_policy https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikitech:Labs_Terms_of_use Others at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal#Policies
In mid-2013, the legal team put the standard employee NDA clauses, and a couple others, on-wiki at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreements#Wikimedia_Foundati...
Luis
Thanks Luis!
It looks like the non-disparagement clause has now been removed, which is nice.
There was not one when I joined three years ago. There is still one in the severance agreement I was offered, which is why I didn't sign it - under the circumstances, I didn't feel like I could continue to participate in community processes (strategy, budget, etc.) while signing that clause.
Luis