On 4 June 2011 01:10, Thomas Morton morton.thomas@googlemail.com wrote:
Given the situation can we not be clear on the details of this?
I have various views on the matter, but all of them really depend on what exactly this person did.
As with all such matters I see no reason why discussion of the details cannot be conducted visibly, and if provided with the adequate level of detail I would be happy to venture an opinion.
But precluding that, you are asking the views of a group of people who probably do not have a full (or event partial) view of the facts of this case... for which you are asking for a global response....
And you are then wondering why they question this issue!
I think there is no question is cases such as this; lay the details plainly, and screw any pussy footing around the details. If this individual has a history that means BAD THINGS will happen, I feel details will sway more than allusions.
Tom
We know Poetlister's meatspace identity. Are you demanding that we repeat that?