Question. Didn't the practice of oversighting and deleting selective versions previously cause prolems with misattributing who created the adjacent contributions, by virtue of making the "removed" edits functionally invisible? Is that still an issue? If so, wouldn't it be better for oversight or deletion to still list the offensive edits visibly as "existing", but completely unclickable save for those that have permissions to view them? i.e... the final product would look like this:
Edit 10: Oversighter oversights Edit #4 (no clickable link Edit 9: some user adds fine content: <clickable link for anyone> Edit 8: some user adds fine content: <clickable link for anyone> Edit 7, someone adds bad stuff again, but even worse now: <clickable link for only Oversighters, shows just date/time stamp/contributor name or IP, shows name of Oversighter as having blocked this edit> Edit 6: some user adds fine content: <clickable link for anyone> Edit 5: some user adds fine content: <clickable link for anyone> Edit 4, admin deletes page, restores with out Edit #2 <clickable link for anyone> Edit 3: some user adds fine content: <clickable link for anyone> Edit 2, someone adds defamation or whatever "bad" content, <clickable link for only admins, shows just date/time stamp/contributor name or IP, shows name of admin that last deleted this> Edit 1, new page: <clickable link for anyone>
- Joe