I was thinking particularly of ... Wikifamily (Rodovid),
If you're thinking of _this_ Rodovid http://en.rodovid.org/ (frontend is http://rodovid.org/) I would strongly vote for that.
It's really is
useful for significant audiences,
and
implementable in an elegant way
In fact it's implemented already though development is going on (as never ending process).
I would say that there is great synergy (between Rodovid and Wikipedia) opportunity as there is a lot of genealogy information to be described for Wikipedia.
As of
... if they still need support of any kind, but their proposals for Wikimedia hosting remain.
I don't know (and never new) the team that is not in need of help.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Samuel Kleinmeta.sj@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Erik Moellererik@wikimedia.org wrote:
2009/7/31 Samuel Klein meta.sj@gmail.com:
On critical complex topics, the Foundation could benefit from more discussion and better planning. Why have we made it so hard to start new Projects?
I would suggest that we use the strategy call for proposals to re-surface some of the most important project ideas that people would like to bring attention to.
Yes.
IMO there's simply a lack of community support for a lot of ideas, either because people feel they are bad ideas, out of scope for our mission, already covered within the scope of existing projects, or hard to make work with the existing software. That said, I think there
I was thinking particularly of Wikikids and Wikifamily (Rodovid), which are useful for significant audiences, implementable in an elegant way, about creating and sharing collections of free knowledge, and have existing multilingual communities. I don't know if they still need support of any kind, but their proposals for Wikimedia hosting remain.
are definitely many ideas that are worth exploring further.
My personal favorites:
- a shared repository for structured data, the equivalent to Wikimedia
Commons for data (some coherent synthesis of ideas from FreeBase, OmegaWiki, and Semantic MediaWiki);
- a wiki for the global community of makers to share designs and
prototypes for both functional and entertaining objects, which is becoming increasingly important as fabbing facilities become commonplace;
- a wiki for annotated source code examples, similar to LiteratePrograms.org;
+1
- a wiki for standardization;
- a dedicated public outreach / evangelism wiki.
What would this look like?
Also... *A wiki for book metadata, with an entry for every published work, statistics about its use and siblings, and discussion about its usefulness as a citation (a collaboration with OpenLibrary, merging WikiCite ideas)
Sj
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l