There have been some good suggestions in this thread! I've summarized some of them on meta here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Sister_Projects_Committee
Please help improve that page, and indicate if you would be interested in this work.
SJ
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Pharos pharosofalexandria@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, I would expect for the 'Sister Projects Committee' to have both the options of project fission and project fusion within its toolbag.
Thanks, Richard (User:Pharos)
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Tarc Meridian tarc@hotmail.com wrote:
In some respects, that change would be quite good. My experience on Wikiquote has been unfavorable, to put it mildly, where the en.wiki concept of BLP is non-existent.
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:42:41 +1000 From: jayvdb@gmail.com To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] New Project Process
The policies of each project are different for a very good reason.
e.g. If English Wikiquote was merged into English Wikipedia, the vast majority of the quote pages would be deleted very quickly, for good or ill. I know I would be the first to get out the sickle. :P
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Carlos Felipe Antonorsi
-- John Vandenberg
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l