Just want to reinforce some other comments -- Pine... WMF employees, many of whom gave up subscribing to this list long ago, are real people and this is their livelihood.
Suggestions to start firing people add no value to the discussion and, if anything, detract from the credibility of the other points you are trying to make (which I largely agree with).
Hoping with the benefit of a few days of cooling down that is clear to you as well.
~Nathan
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 7:50 PM Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
There are ways that Wikimedia rebranding consultations could be done collaboratively, politely, and with careful stewardship of donor's money. This is not one of them.
I think that it's time for some people in WMF to move on. Without having access to WMF internal discussions, I don't know exactly who I would remove, but I've had enough of poor coordination, questionable financial decisions, and discourtesy, and I hope that the donors and the Board have too. These problems are not isolated to the rebranding effort, but I think that this is as good a place as any to start replacing employees who aren't working out.
Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe