Maybe the best model would be such: #1 A person willing to switch on moderation on someone contact an admin - good reasons for moderation is required #2 If admin decides not to moderate - inform proponent about it. End of story. #3 If admin decides to moderate - inform about this both proponent and the person to be moderated and ask moderated person if he/she wants to announce this on the list. #4 If she/he wants to have it announced on this list - admin do it with explanation of the reasons.
+
#5 - asking for moderation of someone on this list - ends up with moderation of the proponent :-)
2016-07-26 10:26 GMT+02:00 Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org:
A meta-question: I am wondering whether, if one thinks a user on this list should be moderated, it is better to discuss it privately with the list admins (who, if convinced, could announce the moderation publicly, or not), or publicly on this list (explicitly inviting more opinions, being transparent about my position regarding moderating the user, but also embarrassing the user whatever the outcome).
Thoughts?
A.
Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org>Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe