One thought on that - or maybe more:
I am quite sure that what already is online from wikipedia to wikisource can include everything.
Of course over time there will be changes in conceiving how information should be subdivided and then linked. When I read the message about the "believe-wiki" I thought: but this is already there ... in the different projects.
On the Italian wiktionary for example there is a special glossary on christianity - the thing that is lacking now would be a page where only links to all existing "christianity articles/projects etc." are collected. Last year, when I created the "Merry Christmas" project I tried to do this, but that page is available on the Italian wiktionary only. So the only thing I would create besides the project and inter project links is one wiki where these links on special themes are collected - where you go to a "chapter" called maybe "football" and you find a list of all football related articles on wikipedia, wikinews, links to glossaries etc. of course structured in a certain way. Maybe wikidata could help us in this - I am not really sure - such a thingie needs quite a lot of "thinking about it", but I believe that people interested in only a specific subject would very much appreciate it if they would not have to surf from one project to the other searching for related articles, but finding a pool of grouped information.
I don't say we must do this now - it is as if I feel the time to be a bit too immature to do this as there are too many changes on the way. But I'd like to keep this in mind - it could become necessary (maybe in another form/shape - we'll see).
Ciao, Sabine
___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it