On 07/04/2008, John at Darkstar vacuum@jeb.no wrote:
There are some precedence for something like that, but it takes _years_ and should not be done unless absolutely necessary. If I'm not mistaken you have to establish that the actual contributor is "unknown", and that no one can speak for the contributor.
Then we have an issue of whether a pseudonymous contributor is known or not... They can certainly prove they are the copyright holder, if that's what matters. It needs some serious legal research.