Fred Bauder wrote:
If Wikipedia opinion was strongly against them it would be strongly expressed.
Only if people actually know that something is happening; nobody can object if they aren't aware of it.
Which isn't to say that I find this objectionable, but I do think these sorts of things should be as well-known as possible with some feedback solicited, so Wikipedians don't slowly discover something like this, say, a year after the fact. People probably have differing opinions on what the proper level of involvement between Wikipedia and other groups (especially companies) is, so some sort of consensus should be reached...
-Mark