Wikimedia-l June 2024

wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

89 participants
61 discussions

Wikimedians of the Levant 2023 Annual Activities Report
by Farah Jack Mustaklem 23 Jun '24

23 Jun '24

Dear fellow Wikimedians, On behalf of the Board of the Wikimedians of the Levant User Group, I am pleased to announce the publishing of the 2023 Annual Activities report. You can find the report in English <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedians_of_the_Levant_Annual_Re…>and in Arabic <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikimedians_of_the_Levant_Annual_Re…>on Wikimedia Commons. The year 2023 was a very tragic and somber one in our region, filled with death, destruction, and displacement. Despite that, we have kept our spirits high and managed to have a productive and activity-packed year. We're also looking forward to sharing with you the mid-year report for 2024 in a few weeks' time. Please stay tuned! And as always, we welcome your feedback and would love to collaborate with other affiliates, groups, and individuals in promoting free knowledge projects. Best Regards, Farah Mustaklem Board Member Wikimedians of the Levant UG User:Fjmustak https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fjmustak

1 0

Wikimedia Foundation Board liaisons reflections on final Movement charter draft
by Nataliia Tymkiv 23 Jun '24

23 Jun '24

Dear all, We are grateful to the Movement Charter Drafting Committee (MCDC) members, who have dedicated their time and energy to putting forward this final draft of the Movement Charter. They have demonstrated tremendous resilience and perseverance in grappling with ways to increase our collective sense of belonging as a movement, and outlining roles and responsibilities intended to help us all make better decisions in steering the Wikimedia movement into the future. For some, this final draft Charter represents an extension of the Movement Strategy process that began in earnest in 2020. There are many reflections on this history, some nostalgic and others less so. The 2030 strategic direction has guided and continues to guide the Wikimedia Foundation’s strategy. As the Foundation’s annual plan this year <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2024-2025/…> observed, there is much to celebrate in the collective advancement of the original ten movement strategy recommendations <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Strategy/Recommendations>, including shared progress in creating more equitable and decentralised decision-making structures. At the same time, we should all recognise that the world around us has shifted significantly since the movement strategy process began, that our limited resources require much more pragmatic trade-offs and choices, and that the Board has a duty to consider the risk, value, cost and benefit of any significant commitments being made to advance the mission. As requested by the MCDC, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees has, over the last few months, shared with the committee its direct feedback on the previous Movement Charter drafts, including its perspectives on the Global Council <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Archive_5#Wikimedia_F…> and its feedback on a previous draft <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Archive_5#Wikimedia_F…> that we posted publicly. Liaisons have also engaged in regular and ongoing meetings with the MCDC members, including inviting the MCDC members to all Board meetings and Strategic retreats since June 2022. Our general observation, which is elaborated in the body of this letter, is that the final draft of the Movement Charter *still does not address the significant concerns* previously raised by the Board. Thus, as liaisons, *our recommendations* to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees are: - *not to ratify* the final draft of the Movement Charter *as proposed; and* - *support* the Foundation in developing *concrete, time-bound next steps* on a more practical scale, allowing us all to *evaluate progress*, and see what to change or build on. We believe that approving this version of the Charter, despite the tremendous amount of work and resources already put into it, would not be the right call. Instead, we think it is better to continue pursuing the same goals the draft Charter also sought to pursue in a different way, by identifying key areas where the final draft Charter provides us with guidance on concrete steps that can be taken towards increasing volunteer and movement oversight of certain core areas of responsibility. We believe this will allow the Foundation, and all of us, to live into the recommendation of Movement Strategy to evaluate, iterate, and adapt <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Strategy/Recommendations/Evaluate,…> as we go, rather than too quickly to agree to new structures that may not yet be fit for purpose. As liaisons, we first shared this recommendation and our reflections with the MCDC on June 18 and then with the rest of the Wikimedia Foundation Board on June 20 (including a short draft brief <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/Boar…>). The Board is reviewing the final draft of the Movement Charter now and *plans to vote during a special meeting between June 25 and July 9*, during the voting period for all affiliates and individuals <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Supplementary_Document/Rat…>. == Context for sharing these reflections: why now? == As liaisons, we believe that the final draft does not address the concerns previously stated by the Board of Trustees in its feedback <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Archive_5#Wikimedia_F…> on previous drafts of the Charter. Specifically, the final draft still falls short of providing a clear enough explanation of *how* it will advance Wikimedia's public interest mission and effectively address the shortcomings of Wikimedia's current structures to enable more effective and equitable decisions. These points are not new and were shared in previous Board feedback to the MCDC, including the January 22 letter (shared publicly in February <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Archive_5#Wikimedia_F…>) in response to the first public draft and the May letter <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Archive_5#Wikimedia_F…> in response to the second public draft. In response to both affiliates and individual contributors who have asked the Foundation to speak more clearly about its views, and do it sooner, we felt it was important to reiterate these points in the interest of transparency and learning. == Process accountability == We, as liaisons, have heard concerns and frustrations about the Movement Charter process. It faced significant challenges and constraints from the impact of the pandemic limiting travel and in-person meetings; resignations of several members of the MCDC; and other issues that extended the timeline to 2.5 years. It was a shared hope by all to have this process successfully wrapped up sooner. For some of this, the Board certainly must take some responsibility. This is the purpose of the Board’s oversight, as well as its governance responsibilities. An important lesson learnt through this experience is that large-scale processes should have more explicit and clear expectations up front so that as a stakeholder the Foundation can engage directly and openly earlier about its own positions, views and boundaries. It is not easy to find this balance, but this is essential to moving forward differently. These and other lessons should be documented, and built upon in any future processes aimed at hard-to-reverse movement-wide commitments (for example, the Playbook <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Reports…> that was developed after the Wikimedia's Movement Strategy process). == Reflections on the final draft == The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees has a legal and fiduciary duty to consider any significant commitment or decision in light of the expected risk, value, cost, and benefit to Wikimedia's public interest mission. The value of new structures proposed in the final draft of the Movement Charter has to be weighed against their risk, their cost, and the resource demands of this movement at a time when we have all seen that the growth rate of revenue is not increasing at the same rate as in the past, while demands to invest more in the Wikimedia platforms, projects, and communities are increasing. As liaisons, we believe the *risks and costs* associated with the currently proposed form of the Global Council *outweigh its potential value*. Firstly and most importantly, the proposed Global Council's *purpose* is not clearly connected to advancing Wikimedia's public interest mission. It lacks a compelling explanation of *how* it will ensure more equitable decision-making and support the mission of sharing free knowledge. It also does not guide us on how to address many of the most pressing issues facing community governance on Wikimedia projects. We recognise that for some, the status quo *also* does not provide that clarity, but we do not believe that the final draft Charter moves us closer. Secondly, we note that the *proposed structure and makeup* of the Global Council have changed significantly with each iteration of the published drafts (from a small body to a large assembly to a flexible-sized body in the most recent text). This may have been done in response to feedback from multiple stakeholders, but it raises an ongoing concern we have expressed in all of our feedback that this proposed structure is not based on the *form following function* principle -- we do not see a deliberate or intentional design that seeks to meet the purpose of such a critical and important new body. Finally, as liaisons we believe that important elements within the final draft Charter, including, most critically, the *Values and Principles*, require more consensus of communities before attempting to incorporate them into a larger document that enshrines binding commitments on us all. Ensuring values are understood, shared, and - importantly - prioritised similarly across the movement is essential to relying on them to help craft an effective and accepted decision-making framework. == Wikimedia Foundation’s commitment: what to do irrespective of the outcome of the ratification vote == As liaisons, the proposal that we are making to the Board is that, instead of ratifying the Movement Charter in its current form, it is better to follow the Movement Strategy Recommendation to experiment <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Strategy/Recommendations/Evaluate,…> more quickly with key areas of responsibility before establishing a more permanent body with a wider scope. That is why, irrespective of the outcome of the final draft Charter vote, the Foundation has already begun to work on shifting core areas of decision-making <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2024-2025/…> to increased volunteer oversight, including *fund dissemination*, and volunteers offering more immediate input on Foundation decisions, such as *advising on product & technology*. More specifically, we propose that by January 2025, fund dissemination, which is one functional area of the proposed Global Council, be handled by a global decision-making body to determine the Wikimedia Foundation's regional allocation of grants budgets for the rest of fiscal year 2024-2025 and to plan grantmaking estimates for the next two years. A global, but narrower scope, will help to experiment with more accountability for the results. This process, which we shall ask to be co-created with affiliates and individual community members, would build on the experience of the Regional Funds Committees <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Resources/Grants_Strategy_Relaunc…>, and the past Funds Dissemination Committee <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Funds_Dissemination_Committee>, in line with the Movement Strategy 2030 Initiative #27 <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Strategy/Initiatives/Flexible_reso…> and the work currently taking place with Affiliate EDs and Regional Funds Committees to determine the Wikimedia Foundation's regional allocation of grants budgets for FY 2024-2025. It is important to document and publish the lessons learned from each step of the process and use these to inform future decision-making and the possible creation of permanent committees and/or movement bodies. Additionally, as liaisons we also propose moving forward with the establishment of a Product & Technology Advisory Council <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Product_and_Technology_Advisory_Council/Pro…>, following a proposal from the Foundation that was shared with the MCDC. This is in line with Movement Strategy 2030 Initiative #31 <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Strategy/Initiatives/Technology_Co…> to advance shared decision-making and co-creative spaces in technology spaces that are fundamental to support the mission. == Next steps == As all affiliates and individuals prepare to vote on the final Charter draft, we as liaisons hope that voters will also take the time to provide written comments alongside their “yes”, “no”, and “--” <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Supplementary_Document/Rat…> vote so that everyone will learn as much as possible about how we all can move forward with decision-making structures that are more effective, with an equity lens, for our complex global community to advance Wikimedia’s mission in the world. As previously noted, the Board is reviewing the final draft of the Movement charter now and *plans to vote during a special meeting between June 25 and July 9*, during the voting period for all affiliates and individuals <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Supplementary_Document/Rat…>. This will allow the Board to consider all public comments available before the start of the voting while casting its vote alongside affiliates and individual contributors. At the MCDC’s request, the results of the Board’s vote will be shared only after the vote of individuals and affiliates has concluded, so as not to influence their voting, but likely before the outcomes of those votes are published, and not before July 10. As we all await the outcome of the final draft Charter vote, it will be important to be ready to take concrete steps that will help move us forward as a movement. Wikimania will be an opportunity to begin constructive and productive conversations on these and other immediate next steps, informed by the comments left by individuals and affiliates during the vote. Working together on practical, time-bound steps will shape a better and more equitable framework for making decisions. With a shared commitment, this moment of change can foster a greater sense of belonging, one that can sometimes feel elusive in this widely diverse global movement. Best regards Nat and Lorenzo Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees liaisons to the Movement Charter Drafting Committee =========================================== Best regards, antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees *NOTICE: You may have received this message outside of your normal working hours/days, as I usually can work more as a volunteer during weekend. You should not feel obligated to answer it during your days off. Thank you in advance!*

12 15

CEE Hub voting recommendation for the Movement Charter ratification
by Kiril Simeonovski 22 Jun '24

22 Jun '24

Hi everyone, The ratification of the Movement Charter is a key step towards implementing the recommendations and goals that we all together in Wikimedia have been working on since 2017. The Wikimedia CEE Hub and its Steering Committee, with its 10 members from 9 different countries of the CEE region, recommends ratifying the final version of the Movement Charter. This follows discussions and consultations with the CEE communities over the last few months, including presenting the opinions and views of those communities who could not attend the Wikimedia Summit. We acknowledge that the Charter is lacking in certain aspects (as detailed below), but the direction of the Charter provides opportunities and possibilities for communities and affiliates that can serve as the foundation for the further development of Wikimedia towards a more equitable and fair community. The CEE Hub has provided an analysis of the Movement Charter <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Pz5irzyJb2GeJZFPGFi6qIGXj-2BHP5l1nF…> that serves as the basis of this recommendation, and includes the following arguments for ratification: - Volunteers and communities are given the right to demand a “Care Responsibility” from their local affiliate, their regional network and the global movement bodies. - Communities are held to certain standards of equal access and openness, which, while a non-issue in most communities, will also make it easier to hold projects accountable that do not follow this principle. - Movement Bodies (including affiliates and hubs) have stated rights and responsibilities that can be argued at an independent body, including disputes with the Wikimedia Foundation. - The right to fundraise is stated and provides the basis for a future dialogue on what the financial sustainability of Wikimedia should look like. - The Wikimedia Foundation is treated as a supportive part of the Wikimedia Movement and not as the superior decision-making organisation. - The new core of the global governance structure, the Global Council, has the necessary tools to bring meaningful change to the way we work together. While these arguments merit ratification of the Movement Charter, the following aspects will require the attention of the first Global Council: - Relationships between key Wikimedia stakeholders, like the one between the Wikimedia Foundation and the Global Council, will have to be defined in more detail. - The budgetary planning process of all movement funds will have to become a truly participatory process under the guidance of the Global Council and include a long-term strategic plan. - The transition to or establishment of new decision-making structures should not result in parallel processes and putting more burden on volunteers and communities. - Decision-making processes should be located as close to those affected by those decisions, instead of continuing centralised decision-making that does not solve the causes of our current structural and organisational issues in Wikimedia. On behalf of the Steering Committee of the CEE Hub, Kiril Simeonovski

1 0

EuroPride 2024 Thessaloniki with Wiki Loves (Euro)Pride
by Željko Blaće 22 Jun '24

22 Jun '24

Dear ALL, EuroPride 2024 program in Thessaloniki started https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsXUemqGJlc and so is our Wiki Loves (Euro)Pride campaign on Meta (supported by Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group and few partners) https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Loves_EuroPride_2024 Our aim this year is to outreach and experiment publishing methods of Wikipedia, Wikidata, Commons and others, to document LGBTIQ+ culture and social movements in Greece. Hope you can join us online or next week even in person there. Best wishes - Z. Blace for the coordination team

1 0

The final text of the Wikimedia Movement Charter is now available on Meta for your reading
by Movement Charter Drafting Committee 21 Jun '24

21 Jun '24

Hi everyone, It is with the greatest pleasure that I would like to let you know that *the final text of the Movement Charter <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter>* is shared on Meta. Translations into more than 20 languages will be available on June 18. The supplementary Charter documents will be updated on June 18 as well. What is the Wikimedia Movement Charter? The Wikimedia Movement Charter is a proposed document to define roles and responsibilities for all the members and entities of the Wikimedia movement, including the creation of a new body – the Global Council – for movement governance. Join the Wikimedia Movement Charter “Launch Party” Join the “Launch Party” <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:Movement_Charter_Launch_Party> on June 20 at 14.00-15.00 UTC (your local time <https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1718892000>). During this call, we will celebrate the release of the final Charter and present the content of the Charter. Join <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:Movement_Charter_Launch_Party> and learn about the Charter before casting your vote! Movement Charter ratification vote Voting will commence on SecurePoll on June 25 2024 at 00:01 UTC and will conclude on July 9 2024 at 23:59 UTC. You can read more about the voting process, eligibility criteria, and other details on Meta <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Ratification/Voting>. On behalf of the MCDC, I want to thank everyone for the input the MCDC has received over the past 2.5 years on all the different drafts of the Charter: all these perspectives and feedback were invaluable building blocks for the final document. If you have any questions, please leave a comment on the Meta talk page <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter> or email the MCDC at mcdc(a)wikimedia.org On behalf of the MCDC, Ciell This message is available in other languages here <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Announc…>

3 3

Good and Featured articles promotion time
by Abraham Israeli 21 Jun '24

21 Jun '24

Hi there, I have a question about the right way to extract the accurate time (or revision ID) of when an article becomes a featured article (FA) or a good article (GA). The first and most straightforward method I tried was to extract the first time that a {{featured article}} tag (or a {{good article}} one) is found in the article revision text. However, in some cases, this yields weird results, such as an article being an FA on the same day it was created. Another method I tried (without much success) was to extract this information from the article talk page under the "Article History" section. However, not all pages have this section, and I'm not sure how reliable this information is (are all editors adding the date when the article got a promotion or maybe the nomination date?) So, I wonder if anyone can advise on the best way to extract this information in the most accurate way. Isn't there any database table that holds such information? Thank you all in advance! Abraham

2 3

Invitation to join DCW Conversation Hour June 2024
by Namrah 20 Jun '24

20 Jun '24

1 0

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin: an experiment
by Nataliia Tymkiv 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

Dear all, Please read below if you want to provide constructive feedback on improving communication from and about the Wikimedia Foundation. It is quite difficult to meet everyone’s communications expectations in every channel and format, so the goal is to keep trying new things to see what can be improved. The Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin [1] is an experiment to establish a more standardised format and cadence which would include headlines and links from the Wikimedia Foundation's technical work, and also work with communities, and affiliates as well as other stakeholders like readers, donors, regulators, the media and the public. Past feedback that has informed this approach suggests that: (1) regular top-line communication seems to be the best way to be connected; (2) the communication should be with a known publishing frequency, and that any additional communication in between is only if something urgent happens; (3) there should be links to other specialised newsletters, updates from the Foundation, and searchable archives of previous editions; (4) and that this type of connection would be beneficial to avoid over communicating. A new edition of the Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin is envisioned to be published bi-weekly. You can subscribe to the bulletin <https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Target…> via talk page delivery on any Wikimedia wiki. Based on your feedback, a potential commitment to this form of communication would be planned for the 2024-2025 fiscal year. The headlines would focus on the Foundation's work (including the Board) — planned office hours, meetings, ongoing public conversations, community feedback rounds, open issues, updates, etc. Regularity and predictability would also help the multilingual reach of our communications by helping all translators plan their time, knowing when something would be coming their way. It would also help the teams at the Foundation know when and where to share information into this aggregated source to be included in the bulletin. This experiment described above is aimed at asking for initial feedback on the idea. If this experiment is successful, it can provide a single point of standardised and aggregated information from the Foundation with many links to more detailed sources. If the concept works, additional time and effort can be dedicated to making the format more attractive and functional; but if not, the Foundation will not go down this road, and can try something else. And apologies in advance about the design—or lack of it. There is interest in improving it further, but for a prototype, content and speed were prioritised over the form :) As a note: regular communications from the Foundation will continue as they are while we all learn if the Bulletin is a better way to aggregate information. So, please find here a page on Meta with a short overview of the concept itself: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Bulletin And here you can find the first “trial” issue: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Bulletin/2024/06-01 Your feedback <https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_Bull…> is welcome on the concept itself, but of course, details and suggestions on anything from the design to specific words used would also be helpful! As this is an experiment, this issue is published on Meta [1], here, and will be published on the English Wikipedia Village pump (WMF), to check the reception, what is missing, what is too much, and whether this is something to consider investing more time and effort into. But if you like this experiment and want to share it with your community, by all means, do translate it and post it where appropriate on your wiki, and let us know how it was received on the talk page [2] or email askcac(a)wikimedia.org! [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Bulletin [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_Bulletin P.S. There might also be an opportunity to talk about it at the next Conversation with the Wikimedia Foundation’s Board of Trustees <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Comm…> on 27 June at 18:00 UTC. Best regards, antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees *NOTICE: You may have received this message outside of your normal working hours/days, as I usually can work more as a volunteer during weekend. You should not feel obligated to answer it during your days off. Thank you in advance!*

1 0

[WikiForHumanRights 2024] Join us to learn how to use the Content Translation Tool for your local activities
by Euphemia Uwandu 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

Hi Everyone, As we step into the new week, here's another learning opportunity <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:Using_Content_Translation_for_your_Ca…> to explore how you can use the content translation tool for section and language translations as part of the WikiForHumanRights 2024 global translation drive. *This session is a great opportunity for regional coordinators, local organizers, campaign participants, Wikimedia communities and interested community members** to learn how to use the tool to:* * - Make translations for a specific language- Improve articles with Section Translation- Use URLs to help newcomers target specific languages with translation- Request features or sharing requests for feedback or improvements to the Content Translation tool* *Register <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:Using_Content_Translation_for_your_Ca…> to join us on 28 June at 15:00 UTC for another learning moment.* During the week, we will also share the recording of the 13 June Expert Panel <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Event:WikiForHumanRights_2024_Expert_Panel> here or on the event page. Please look out for the post soon. Kindly, Euphemia

1 0

Conversation with the Trustees on 27 June
by Victoria Doronina 17 Jun '24

17 Jun '24

Hi all, I’d like to invite you to join me at the next Conversation with the Wikimedia Foundation’s Board of Trustees <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Comm…> on 27 June at 18:00 UTC (check your local time <https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1719511200>). The 90-minute call will take place on Zoom, with simultaneous streaming to YouTube <https://youtube.com/live/DBgOvuMs-UA?feature=share>, and the recording will be uploaded to Commons. We’ll spend the first half of the call on updates and agenda items (agenda items will be added to the Meta page soon) and the second half on open Q&A. Bring your questions and ideas to talk with us live. We encourage you to join us directly in the room on Zoom. If you’d like the Zoom link, please email askcac(a)wikimedia.org. You can also request interpretation or ask any questions ahead of time using the same address. Thanks, Victoria, on behalf of the Community Affairs Committee <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Comm…> of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees -- Kind regards, Victoria Victoria Doronina <https://wikimediafoundation.org/profile/dr-victoria-doronina/> Trustee Sister Projects Taskforce Lead Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/> Imagine a world in which everyone can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Please help us make it a reality.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Wikimedia-l June 2024