Wikimedia-l July 2019

wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

77 participants
44 discussions

New Wikiclubs in Tavush province
by Wikimedia Armenia Board 22 Jul '19

22 Jul '19

Dear all, I am glad to inform you that a memorandum has been signed between Wikimedia Armenia Scientific-Educational NGO and Tavush Province Administration of the Republic of Armenia, according to which the latter is obliged to 1. Support the establishment and regular work of Wikiclubs in Tavush region 2. Equip the Wikiclubs with notebooks, provide with fast and consistent internet 3. Encourage the implementation of Wiki projects in the learning process and the active participation of teachers and students in projects carried out by Wikimedia Armenia 4. Spread information on events carried out by Wikimedia Armenia among teachers of the region 5. Support other educational initiatives accomplished by Wikimedia Armenia This arrangement allows Wikimedia Armenian to increase the number of its Wikiclubs, spread and develop the Wiki movement in Tavush region, and contribute to expanding educational opportunities. At the moment there are 7 Wikiclubs (Gosh, Archis, Sarigyugh, Kirants, Lusahovit and two clubs in Noyemberyan) in Tavush region. It is anticipated to gradually establish Wikiclubs in all communities of the region. Wikimedia Armenia NGO Chair of the Board Vahagn Piliposyan

1 0

Recognition of the Dehalvi Wikimedia Community User Group
by Kirill Lokshin 19 Jul '19

19 Jul '19

Hi everyone! I'm very happy to announce that the Affiliations Committee has recognized [1] the Dehalvi Wikimedia Community User Group [2] as a Wikimedia User Group. The group aims to promote Urdu-language Wikimedia projects in India. Please join me in congratulating the members of this new user group! Regards, Kirill Lokshin Chair, Affiliations Committee [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/Resolutions/Recognit… [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Dehalvi_Wikimedia_User_Group

5 4

CEE Meeting 2019 registration is extended until August 3
by Ivana Madžarević 19 Jul '19

19 Jul '19

Hello everyone, I would like to inform you that* the deadline for the CEE Meeting 2019 registration is extended until August 3! * Although we have announced that here will be no extension of deadline, we'll do that due to a lot of suggestion from the communities. Some of the CEE communities need more time to choose their representatives and unfortunately that caused small number of registered participants so far. I will use this opportunity to strongly suggest to the all of the delegates to register in timely manner. You can find more details on the following links: - Registration form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeRR002uKE4lrzJYTt4qJ9uhioFI7bLmiq… - CEE Meeting meta page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_CEE_Meeting_2019 *Please note that there will be no more extensions and that only those who register until August 3 will be taken into account. * Feel free to reach out if you need assistance or additional information. Best, Ивана Маџаревић менаџер пројеката и заједнице, Викимедија Србије p: 011 3348 468 m: 060 74 54 773 a: Дечанска 4/3, Београд s: rs.wikimedia.org e: ivana.madzarevic(a)vikimedija.org *Замислите свет у коме свака особа на планети има слободан приступ целокупном људском знању. То је оно на чему ми радимо.*

1 0

Movement Strategy: Community conversations on- and offline; Wikimania
by Nicole Ebber 18 Jul '19

18 Jul '19

Dear fellow Wikimedians, Working groups are busy analyzing community conversations and are integrating insights from these as well as expert feedback and input into their work. From this, they have started to put ideas and concepts together and are turning these into draft recommendations for structural changes that will help us advance in our strategic direction: To become the support system for the whole free knowledge movement. These drafts will be published for movement input in August. Affiliate communities across the globe have begun launching strategy salons to share their ideas about the future of our movement. The diverse range of perspectives being shared here is enriching the conversations that working groups are having. And we have added another opportunity to get involved in the community conversations: online surveys. == Wikimedia 2030 @ Wikimania 2019 == Visit the Wikimedia 2030 space [1] at Wikimania! The space will be a lively hub of discussions about building the future of our movement. Representatives from each working group will host public discussion sessions with the community to learn from them and review the draft recommendations for each thematic area in person. We will also host meet-ups in the main conference hotel on the Friday and Saturday evenings, where we’ve got more fun things planned. We are currently putting the finishing touches on the program and more updates on all of this will follow in the coming weeks. == Talking movement strategy around the globe == >From South East Asia to Africa and beyond: Movement strategy is all about generating global engagement and discussions about our future. Over 30 community members from across the Asia-Pacific region came together to discuss our shared future at the ESEAP Strategy Summit in Bangkok. Our call for strategy salon grant proposals resulted in 44 grants being awarded, and strategy-focused events have recently been held in Cameroon, Uganda, and Morocco. Upcoming salons will take place in Estonia, Bangladesh, Venezuela, and the Levant. In addition, the Capacity Building (see blog post)[2] and Roles and Responsibilities working groups have held in-person meetings in Singapore and in Utrecht to work on drafting recommendations. And there’s more to come: the Resource Allocation working group will meet this week in Madrid and Community Health will come together next week in Amman. And you can share your thoughts and ideas at anytime and from anywhere on Meta [3] as part of the ongoing community conversations. == Take part in movement strategy online surveys == If you prefer to participate anonymously or could not join any of your community’s or group’s conversations yet, an additional way to get involved is to take part in our online survey [4]. Here, you can share your perspectives about the structural part of our movement, particularly in relation to your local or thematic context. There are surveys for each of the nine thematic areas, and the surveys are available in a number of languages. Following a soft launch to test the questions and quality of the translations, we now encourage the wider movement to take part and contribute to ongoing global discussions. == Community conversations report for June is now live == If you want to get a good snapshot of the ideas, opinions, and thoughts that have been put forward in all of these discussions, then we have a reading recommendation for you: the June community conversations report [5]! The report offers a summary of all the input gathered during discussions that happened on Meta, at regional salons, and during conversations facilitated by the strategy liaisons. If you have any questions or feedback, please feel free to get in touch. Best wishes, Nicole [1] https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2019:Wikimedia_2030 [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Blog_po… [3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Partici… [4] https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_d718KRfJ5W3OVYV and https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe9cyOksUM4rJVt6DHLEjZ7xo7IL7BMS-_… [5] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Reports… -- Nicole Ebber Adviser International Relations Program Manager Wikimedia 2030 Movement Strategy Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0 https://wikimedia.de Unsere Vision ist eine Welt, in der alle Menschen am Wissen der Menschheit teilhaben, es nutzen und mehren können. Helfen Sie uns dabei! https://spenden.wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland — Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.

1 0

Recognition of Wikimedia Community User Group Math
by Kirill Lokshin 18 Jul '19

18 Jul '19

Hi everyone! I'm very happy to announce that the Affiliations Committee has recognized [1] Wikimedia Community User Group Math [2] as a Wikimedia User Group. The group aims to coordinate global activities to improve the display and retrieval of mathematical expressions, with the long-term objective of making mathematical knowledge better accessible to every human being. Please join me in congratulating the members of this new user group! Regards, Kirill Lokshin Chair, Affiliations Committee [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Affiliations_Committee/Resolutions/Recognit… [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_User_Group_Math

4 3

Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikimedia Announcements] Fwd: Wikimedia Community User Group Uganda 2018/2019 Report
by Asaf Bartov 17 Jul '19

17 Jul '19

Congratulations, Erina and WCUG Uganda, on a clear and informative report! One area to consider improving would be on-wiki contributions by the core user group volunteers. Cheers, A. On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 9:14 PM Erina Mukuta <erinamukuta(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > *To whom it may concern* > below is the link to the over due annual report for the mentioned usergroup > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2018-2019_Annual_Report > > Kind regards > -- > > *Erina Mukuta*Wikimedia Community User Group Uganda > Tel: *+256774424843* > skype: mukuta.erina twitter: > @erinamukuta > *https://wikiuganda.wordpress.com/ <https://wikiuganda.wordpress.com/>* > > *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Erinamukuta > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Erinamukuta>* > > > _______________________________________________ > Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately > directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia > community. For more information about Wikimedia-l: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > _______________________________________________ > WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list > WikimediaAnnounce-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l > -- Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org> Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org

2 1

[Wikimedia Research Showcase] July 17, 2019 at 11:30 AM PDT, 18:30 UTC
by Janna Layton 17 Jul '19

17 Jul '19

Hi all, The next Research Showcase will be live-streamed next Wednesday, July 17, at 11:30 AM PDT/18:30 UTC. YouTube stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9vvwV5KfW4 As usual, you can join the conversation on IRC at #wikimedia-research. You can also watch our past research showcases here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase This month's presentations: Characterizing Incivility on Wikipedia Elizabeth Whittaker, University of Michigan School of Information In a society whose citizens have a variety of viewpoints, there is a question of how citizens can govern themselves in ways that allow these viewpoints to co-exist. Online deliberation has been posited as a problem solving mechanism in this context, and civility can be thought of as a mechanism that facilitates this deliberation. Civility can thus be thought of as a method of interaction that encourages collaboration, while incivility disrupts collaboration. However, it is important to note that the nature of online civility is shaped by its history and the technical architecture scaffolding it. Civility as a concept has been used both to promote equal deliberation and to exclude the marginalized from deliberation, so we should be careful to ensure that our conceptualizations of incivility reflect what we intend them to in order to avoid unintentionally reinforcing inequality. To this end, we examined Wikipedia editors’ perceptions of interactions that disrupt collaboration through 15 semi-structured interviews. Wikipedia is a highly deliberative platform, as editors need to reach consensus about what will appear on the article page, a process that often involves deliberation to coordinate, and any disruption to this process should be apparent. We found that incivility on Wikipedia typically occurs in one of three ways: through weaponization of Wikipedia’s policies, weaponization of Wikipedia’s technical features, and through more typical vitriolic content. These methods of incivility were gendered, and had the practical effect of discouraging women from editing. We implicate this pattern as one of the underlying causes of Wikipedia’s gender gap. Hidden Gems in the Wikipedia Discussions: The Wikipedians’ Rationales Lu Xiao, Syracuse University School of Information Studies I will present a series of completed and ongoing studies that are aimed at understanding the role of the Wikipedians’ rationales in Wikipedia discussions. We define a rationale as one’s justification of her viewpoint and suggestions. Our studies demonstrate the potential of leveraging the Wikipedians’ rationales in discussions as resources for future decision-making and as resources for eliciting knowledge about the community’s norms, practices and policies. Viewed as rich digital traces in these environments, we consider them to be beneficial for the community members, such as helping newcomers familiarize themselves on the commonly accepted justificatory reasoning styles. We call for more research attention to the discussion content from this rationale study perspective. -- Janna Layton (she, her) Administrative Assistant - Audiences & Technology Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>

2 3

WikiIndaba conference announcement
by Bobby Shabangu 17 Jul '19

17 Jul '19

Dear all, We would like to inform you that after long deliberations between the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) and the WikiIndaba Steering Committee (WISCom) we have reached an agreement that the suitable dates to host the WikiIndaba conference 2019 in Abuja, Nigeria will be from 8 - 10 November. We know that this news will disappoint many of you, who were gearing up for the meeting. Unfortunately, operational difficulties created some delays. We have discussed this with the staff of the WMF, and all agree that a postponement will give us some extra time to ensure that a quality event is planned for all. WikiIndaba conference is a key pillar in the Wikimedia movement strategic direction, and an important platform for the African Wikimedia community. WISCom and the WMF continue to support Wikimedia Nigeria as the host and venue for the conference. We greatly appreciate your support and understanding, and we hope to see you at WikiIndaba! Kind regards, Bobby Shabangu

2 1

Fram en.wp office yearlock block
by Techman224 16 Jul '19

16 Jul '19

Forwarding to WIkimedia-l since WikiEN-l is relatively dead. Since this message, an Arbcom member (SilkTork) stated that they weren't consulted, nor did this action was the result of Arbcom forwarding a concern to the office. [1] The only non-response excuse from the WMF [2] was that "local communities consistently struggle to uphold not just their own autonomous rules but the Terms of Use, too.” even though there were no complaints on-wiki nor to Arbcom privately. The on-wiki discussion is taking place at the Bureaucrats and the Arbcom noticeboards. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard#User:Fra… <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#User:Fram_banned_for_1_year_by_WMF_office> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticebo…'s_ban [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Commi… <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Commi…> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard#Statemen… Techman224 > Begin forwarded message: > > From: George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [WikiEN-l] Fram en.wp office yearlock block > Date: June 10, 2019 at 8:54:34 PM CDT > To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> > Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> > > In case you're not following on-wiki - Office S&T blocked English Wikipedia > user / administrator Fram for a year and desysopped, for unspecified > reasons in the Office purview. There was a brief statement here from > Office regarding it which gave no details other than that normal policy and > procedures for Office actions were followed, which under normal > circumstances preclude public comments. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard#User:Fra… > > Several people on Arbcom and board have commented they're making private > inquiries under normal reporting and communication channels, due to the > oddity and essentially uniqueness of the action. > > There was an initial surge of dismay which has mellowed IMHO into "Ok, > responsible people following up". > > I understand the sensitivity of some of the topics under Office actions, > having done OTRS and other various had-to-stay-private stuff myself at > times in the past. A high profile investigation target is most unusual but > not unheard of. > > I did send email to Fram earlier today asking if they had any public > comment, no reply as yet. > > > -- > -george william herbert > george.herbert(a)gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

40 177

Open Letter to Affiliations Committee : Wikimedia India's Demand For A Fair And Transparent Hearing
by Abhinav srivastava 16 Jul '19

16 Jul '19

Dear Friends From Affcom, I am posting an open public request for your notice of Suspension moved at Wikimedia India (WMIN) which we continue to contest and to our ignored demand of having a public hearing as shared with you all over mail and shared again here under Annexure [A]. You have taken an official position on suspension without even hearing us even once, unexplained accusations have been provided and we continue to believe Affcom has been insufficiently investigating facts before making judgements. We repeatedly over and over again provided justifications over Mail but you never took them to your notice and only over calls you heard us, provided your rationale for expectation gaps but never took our oral commentary which refutes your claims,in any action, anywhere. Now you say WMIN won’t remain a Chapter after 14th September and be transformed into a User Group. Republic of India happens to be one of the only few countries where besides volunteer driven Chapter and User Groups has a full-time staff based WMF’s Allied Organisation CIS-A2K [1]. Wikimedia India activities [2] may be less due to no source of funds [3] however, Community Members from India put their efforts, strive hard to take the movement ahead. Whether it be the previous financial year or the present, no Wikimedia Foundation Grants like Rapid Grant, Project Grant etc have been applied by Wikimedia India members to support any Chapter activity. They remain self-financed. We received your notice last year when Wikimedia India was contesting a dispute with CIS-A2K over attribution grabbing for our self-financed projects and ignoring Chapter at important National level initiaves [4]. While working with virtually no source of funds and struggles with WMF’s Allied Organisation, your notice of suspension was the least bad we could have had. We continue to contest your suspension notice. It was Suo Moto (on its own) decision making and as found and re-stated above and below in detail, there were gaps and misunderstanding in your basis. We also continue to contest there has been a Rush-to-decision making. No written responses via Mail to Chapter’s clarification are being provided and invitation for calls are initiated where brief responses are shared on a Cloud Document. It has been subsequently found by both parties on there being gaps in communication. However, even after clarity during call, Affcom has not taken any action over them. The basis of your suspension notice has been shared here for the wider audience. 1. Legal Structure : Affcom asked Wikimedia India to resolve and obtain its necessary license in order to obtain funds. At present, as per Government of India restrictions it is difficult to obtain foreign funding. Wikimedia India informed the Affcom on roughly 13,000 Non-Government Organisations (NGO)s [5] are struggling with a similar crisis to which Affcom responded, “reconsider applying for a User Group.” and “no evidence that the current organization’s leadership will be able to drive this problem toward resolution”. Chapter efforts and commitment in resolving the said crisis cannot be dusted in few words. A Government restrictive policy which has an impact on 13,000 NGOs and Affcom finding flaws in WMIN Board Members capability. WMIN would leave it for public interpretation. Why not a capability audit for hosting zero-budget activities? While most of the time are being spent on resolving the said crisis, WMIN continues to undertake activities as listed. Taking the Open Knowledge Movement forward remains a commitment for the Chapter irrespective of whatsoever political climate may remain. Affcom was asked two questions respectively in this regard however no response has been attained. The questions are 1. Would zero-budget activities, those self-financed not meet sufficiency ? Please elaborate for us to stand better and to improve upon. 2. Would resolving Legal Structure and being able to receive WMF Grants be a necessary criteria for WMIN to meet sufficiency or continued activities not meet the fulfilment criteria? (2) Open Governance : Affcom informed Chapter that a member needs to be in physical presence at the Chapter Assembly to cast vote and raise voice and asked The Chapter to change its bylaws. This information is anything but false. This was communicated during the Call but Affcom did not bring anything in action. Also, as per the Chapter Agreement between WMF and WMIN, a copy of bylaws was provided in English Language to WMF. The bylaws were approved by the then Chapter’s Council. No evidence has been brought to notice on WMIN violating the Clause 7.2 of the Chapter’s Agreement, “The Wikimedia Chapter shall be required to advise the Foundation of any planned or actual change in the bylaws or status of the Chapter which might affect the Foundation or the continued existence or effectiveness of this Agreement.” (3) Active Contributor Involvement :The November 10 email carried the statement, “The chapter lacks broad and diverse membership, community representation, as well as buy-in and involvement “ and “Membership seems to be sourced through university leadership rather than through open community participation and representation.” Chapter till date received no evidence or logic construction on how the said argument was reached. Later during the call, Affcom did acknowledge that there has been a communication gap. Chapter further floated the idea of sharing the Member’s data base after discussing privacy policy over them. (4) Capacity : WMIN was able to submit its annual reports on 21st December, 2018 (3.5 months late) due to a notice by Income-Tax department which caused delay in preparing our Financial reports. Although we do not have any annual grants or use any money to support any activity, as per Chapter’s agreement, affiliate is required to submit Financial Results. Meanwhile, WMIN reported its activities on every quarterly basis and shared it with the wider Indian community via India Mailing List and also other channels [6], [7], [8],[9]. Annual activity report is a compilation from the quarterly reports. Affcom claimed via Cloud document that no high level response submitted and repeated delay is not accepted. WMIN informed Affcom that previous delay needs to be looked at independently from earlier financial period and suspension notice (WMIN then had a grant), but we received no response. (5) Organizational Best Practices : Affcom asked us to ‘Resolve’ issues relating to Organizational Best Practices, however, no information had been received on respective deliverables not been met. The November 10, email carried the statement, “There are concerns about whether” referring that Affcom was also not sure themselves. WMIN shared the best practices after placing it in front of the community on member’s mailing list for more than 15 days. To this Affcom responded that you are late with your submission hence we are terminating your contract. They never shared an evidence and when WMIN took its time placed it in-front of the community and then submitted, they said delayed and instead of sending their response in writing over mail they again invited us for a call. We continue to insist on providing a written response via Mail but no action. (6) Action Plan : Affcom asked us to submit an Action Plan and we kept asking what deliverable are needed. We cannot commit on resolving Government restrictions within a said timeline as more than 13,000 NGOs struggle with the similar crisis. We emphasised again and again we have been running zero-budget activities and working for the movement. We asked them to review Organizational Best Practices, based on gaps we could have taken things into consideration. They rather said, you have missed the deadline, so WMIN has to be closed now. To sum up, Affcom friends, you made up your own decision, you made up you own hearing and you made up your own decision. It was a monologue masked in the name of a dialogue. I encourage you all to be in our boots someday, hosting activities on zero-budget, fighting with the Government bureaucracy to attain some funding as a help, the challenge of having a staff-based organisation in parallel, struggle with self-financing activities and most importantly working with Affcom to save yourself from their de-recognition threats. If you believe you are correct, please abide to the request made under Annexure [A] and put everything in public domain. Let community read for themselves and decide. If Affcom is more transparent about its investigation and actions then community would be able to better understand the work and provide an opinion. Regards, Abhinav ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CIS-A2K [2] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaindia-l/2019-April/013994.ht… \ [3] Foreign Currency (Regulation) Act, 1960 compliance do not permit India Chapter to receive money from its primary fiscal sponsor, Wikimedia Foundation. [4] Board of Directors at CIS, acknowledged in March, 2019 for a compliant made in August, 2018 for CIS-A2K Staff not doing their duty to the order. [5] https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/06/07/democracies-need-a-little-help-from-th… [6] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaindia-l/2017-July/013030.html [7] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaindia-l/2017-October/013089.… [8] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaindia-l/2018-January/013188.… [9] https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimediaindia-l/2018-April/013295.ht… --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annexure [A] Reallocating the Affcom - WMIN Communication To Meta : No communications over email, video call, social media, instant messaging, or anywhere but wiki! While this would not just be aligned with the editing spirit, it would promote greater transparency and also helpful for us to communicate the message to our community members. While, we understand Affcom had been advocating the same, however, taking care of privacy concerns, do let us. Once we hear from Affcom on having no privacy concerns, we may reallocate the discussions. If there a consent to this, would request a green light also for 1. Archiving the entire email conversation over a cloud document and linking it to the relevant Meta page. 2. Documenting Internet Calls in an attempt to resolve communication gaps and linking them to Meta page for greater transparency. 3. Based on Principal of Free Speech, allowing anybody to use the discussion page for expression of their views. 4. Any Volunteer is free to translate the text into the language of their choice. 5. Upload All PDF sent via Mails to Commons and link them to the Meta Page. 6. All relevant customs and procedures which exist for any Meta page to be in action.

7 6

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Wikimedia-l July 2019