Wikimedia-l May 2013

wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org

184 participants
137 discussions

The case for supporting open source machine translation
by Erik Moeller 22 May '13

22 May '13

Wikimedia's mission is to make the sum of all knowledge available to every person on the planet. We do this by enabling communities in all languages to organize and collect knowledge in our projects, removing any barriers that we're able to remove. In spite of this, there are and will always be large disparities in the amount of locally created and curated knowledge available per language, as is evident by simple statistical comparison (and most beautifully visualized in Erik Zachte's bubble chart [1]). Google, Microsoft and others have made great strides in developing free-as-in-beer translation tools that can be used to translate from and to many different languages. Increasingly, it is possible to at least make basic sense of content in many different languages using these tools. Machine translation can also serve as a starting point for human translations. Although free-as-in-beer for basic usage, integration can be expensive. Google Translate charges $20 per 1M characters of text for API usage. [2] These tools get better from users using them, but I've seen little evidence of sharing of open datasets that would help the field get better over time. Undoubtedly, building the technology and the infrastructure for these translation services is a very expensive undertaking, and it's understandable that there are multiple commercial reasons that drive the major players' ambitions in this space. But if we look at it from the perspective of "How will billions of people learn in the coming decades", it seems clear that better translation tools should at least play some part in reducing knowledge disparities in different languages, and that ideally, such tools should be "free-as-in-speech" (since they're fundamentally related to speech itself). If we imagine a world where top notch open source MT is available, that would be a world where increasingly, language barriers to accessing human knowledge could be reduced. True, translation is no substitute for original content creation in a language -- but it could at least powerfully support and enable such content creation, and thereby help hundreds of millions of people. Beyond Wikimedia, high quality open source MT would likely be integrated in many contexts where it would do good for humanity and allow people to cross into cultural and linguistic spaces they would otherwise not have access to. While Wikimedia is still only a medium-sized organization, it is not poor. With more than 1M donors supporting our mission and a cash position of $40M, we do now have a greater ability to make strategic investments that further our mission, as communicated to our donors. That's a serious level of trust and not to be taken lightly, either by irresponsibly spending, or by ignoring our ability to do good. Could open source MT be such a strategic investment? I don't know, but I'd like to at least raise the question. I think the alternative will be, for the foreseeable future, to accept that this piece of technology will be proprietary, and to rely on goodwill for any integration that concerns Wikimedia. Not the worst outcome, but also not the best one. Are there open source MT efforts that are close enough to merit scrutiny? In order to be able to provide high quality result, you would need not only a motivated, well-intentioned group of people, but some of the smartest people in the field working on it. I doubt we could more than kickstart an effort, but perhaps financial backing at significant scale could at least help a non-profit, open source effort to develop enough critical mass to go somewhere. All best, Erik [1] http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/animations/growth/AnimationProjectsGro… [2] https://developers.google.com/translate/v2/pricing -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Wikipedia and our other projects reach more than 500 million people every month. The world population is estimated to be >7 billion. Still a long way to go. Support us. Join us. Share: https://wikimediafoundation.org/

29 55

Wikimedia Foundation's search for a new ED kicks off
by Jay Walsh 21 May '13

21 May '13

Dear all, This afternoon Kat Walsh, Chair of the Board of Trustees for the Wikimedia Foundation announced the kick-off of the search for the next ED of the Wikimedia Foundation: https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/21/search-for-next-wikimedia-foundation-… Please take a moment to read through Kat's note, and please support this process by sharing the news of the ED search throughout your networks (be they digital or analog :). We are hoping to get significant, international coverage of this opportunity, something that will help us reach a wide range of amazing candidates. We'll also be sharing the opportunity via twitter/identi.ca (@wikipedia and @wikimedia) and on Facebook and LinkedIn. Thanks for your help, Jay Walsh --- https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/21/search-for-next-wikimedia-foundation-… Kicking off the search for our next Executive Director Posted by Kat Walsh on May 21, 2013 Today we launch our search for the next Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation. About six weeks ago, the Wikimedia Foundation’s Executive Director Sue Gardner told us she will be stepping down from her role. Happily, she is staying on until we find her successor, and we are now launching that search. It will be a challenge to find someone who is able to fill Sue’s shoes, but I am glad to say that the Board of Trustees, Sue and the senior staff of the Wikimedia Foundation are aligned in our quest for a successor who will build on Sue’s considerable accomplishments, and steer the Wikimedia Foundation toward even greater success in the future. The Wikimedia Foundation is the internationally-active San Francisco-based non-profit organization that operates Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. It supports a global community of tens of thousands of volunteers in collecting, developing, and making the sum of all the world’s knowledge freely available. Over half a billion people use Wikipedia and its sister projects every month. We are the fifth most popular website in the world, and the only donor-supported site in the top 100. We’re widely recognized as the most influential and important organization in the free knowledge movement. Our Executive Director reports to the Board of Trustees and acts in partnership with the global volunteer community, providing the leadership and setting the strategy for the Wikimedia Foundation, while managing its day-to-day operations and activities. The Executive Director is responsible for modernizing the user experience and nurturing, growing and diversifying the community of people who write our projects. He or she also ensures our grantmaking supports innovation across the Wikimedia movement and enables contributor growth in underrepresented demographics and geographies. Our Executive Director needs to understand and advance the Wikimedia movement’s core values. They need to have proven management skills in technology and product development in order to effectively lead a high-traffic website, and have experience designing and implementing planning processes with a high built-in assumption of fast and iterative change. He or she will need to have exceptional communication skills, and possess both a drive to achieve transformative results and a deep respect for collaborative processes. The Executive Director’s ability to effect change in partnership with Wikimedia’s community will be decisive not just to their success, but to Wikimedia’s lasting impact. It’s impossible to know where our next Executive Director will come from: there is no career path that makes running the Wikimedia Foundation somebody’s obvious next step. The right person might or might not currently work at a big web site. They might or might not be in the non-profit sector. They could have a background in education, or product development, or media, or community development, or something entirely different. They may live in the United States, or outside it. In this search, we want to cast a wide net for candidates, so that we can find the person with the rare mix of skills, experiences and values needed for this important role. If you’re reading this post you know how much the work of the Wikimedia Foundation matters. I’m asking you for your help in spreading the news of this unique opportunity. Please share this post widely in your networks. For more information, to suggest potential candidates or to put yourself forward, please write to info(a)moppenheim.com. Some details on the recruitment: We have retained the search firm m/Oppenheim Associates to assist in finding and screening candidates. We’ve worked successfully with m/Oppenheim in the past to fill senior roles at the Foundation. They know us well, and we trust they’ll do a great job with this hire. The full position description is available on the Wikimedia Foundation site, hosted at jobs.wikimedia.org. The hiring process will unfold over the next three to six months; we hope to have a new Executive Director in place by October. That said, we’re going to take the time we need to find the best possible candidate. We are glad to restate that our current Executive Director, Sue Gardner, will stay with us throughout the recruitment process until we have a new Executive Director in place. Following initial screening of the candidates a short-list of applicants will be interviewed by Board members and members of the senior staff, and we will encourage them to get involved with the Wikimedia community (if they aren’t already) to learn more about our movement. (We would also encourage anyone interested in the role to take a look at our guiding principles, or to pick up one of the books documenting and describing the Wikimedia movement.) We’ve set up some pages on meta wiki, the central collaboration wiki, where Wikimedia community members can find more information and also get involved in a public discussion about the role and the recruitment process. Thanks in advance for helping spread the word about this rare and important opportunity. Kat Walsh Chair, Board of Trustees, Wikimedia Foundation -- Jay Walsh Senior Director, Communications WikimediaFoundation.org blog.wikimedia.org +1 (415) 839 6885 x 6609, @jansonw -- Jay Walsh Senior Director, Communications WikimediaFoundation.org blog.wikimedia.org +1 (415) 839 6885 x 6609, @jansonw

1 0

[Wikimedia Announcements] Wikimedia Foundation's search for a new ED kicks off
by Jay Walsh 21 May '13

21 May '13

Dear all, This afternoon Kat Walsh, Chair of the Board of Trustees for the Wikimedia Foundation announced the kick-off of the search for the next ED of the Wikimedia Foundation: https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/21/search-for-next-wikimedia-foundation-… Please take a moment to read through Kat's note, and please support this process by sharing the news of the ED search throughout your networks (be they digital or analog :). We are hoping to get significant, international coverage of this opportunity, something that will help us reach a wide range of amazing candidates. We'll also be sharing the opportunity via twitter/identi.ca (@wikipedia and @wikimedia) and on Facebook and LinkedIn. Thanks for your help, Jay Walsh --- https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/21/search-for-next-wikimedia-foundation-… Kicking off the search for our next Executive Director Posted by Kat Walsh on May 21, 2013 Today we launch our search for the next Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation. About six weeks ago, the Wikimedia Foundation’s Executive Director Sue Gardner told us she will be stepping down from her role. Happily, she is staying on until we find her successor, and we are now launching that search. It will be a challenge to find someone who is able to fill Sue’s shoes, but I am glad to say that the Board of Trustees, Sue and the senior staff of the Wikimedia Foundation are aligned in our quest for a successor who will build on Sue’s considerable accomplishments, and steer the Wikimedia Foundation toward even greater success in the future. The Wikimedia Foundation is the internationally-active San Francisco-based non-profit organization that operates Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. It supports a global community of tens of thousands of volunteers in collecting, developing, and making the sum of all the world’s knowledge freely available. Over half a billion people use Wikipedia and its sister projects every month. We are the fifth most popular website in the world, and the only donor-supported site in the top 100. We’re widely recognized as the most influential and important organization in the free knowledge movement. Our Executive Director reports to the Board of Trustees and acts in partnership with the global volunteer community, providing the leadership and setting the strategy for the Wikimedia Foundation, while managing its day-to-day operations and activities. The Executive Director is responsible for modernizing the user experience and nurturing, growing and diversifying the community of people who write our projects. He or she also ensures our grantmaking supports innovation across the Wikimedia movement and enables contributor growth in underrepresented demographics and geographies. Our Executive Director needs to understand and advance the Wikimedia movement’s core values. They need to have proven management skills in technology and product development in order to effectively lead a high-traffic website, and have experience designing and implementing planning processes with a high built-in assumption of fast and iterative change. He or she will need to have exceptional communication skills, and possess both a drive to achieve transformative results and a deep respect for collaborative processes. The Executive Director’s ability to effect change in partnership with Wikimedia’s community will be decisive not just to their success, but to Wikimedia’s lasting impact. It’s impossible to know where our next Executive Director will come from: there is no career path that makes running the Wikimedia Foundation somebody’s obvious next step. The right person might or might not currently work at a big web site. They might or might not be in the non-profit sector. They could have a background in education, or product development, or media, or community development, or something entirely different. They may live in the United States, or outside it. In this search, we want to cast a wide net for candidates, so that we can find the person with the rare mix of skills, experiences and values needed for this important role. If you’re reading this post you know how much the work of the Wikimedia Foundation matters. I’m asking you for your help in spreading the news of this unique opportunity. Please share this post widely in your networks. For more information, to suggest potential candidates or to put yourself forward, please write to info(a)moppenheim.com. Some details on the recruitment: We have retained the search firm m/Oppenheim Associates to assist in finding and screening candidates. We’ve worked successfully with m/Oppenheim in the past to fill senior roles at the Foundation. They know us well, and we trust they’ll do a great job with this hire. The full position description is available on the Wikimedia Foundation site, hosted at jobs.wikimedia.org. The hiring process will unfold over the next three to six months; we hope to have a new Executive Director in place by October. That said, we’re going to take the time we need to find the best possible candidate. We are glad to restate that our current Executive Director, Sue Gardner, will stay with us throughout the recruitment process until we have a new Executive Director in place. Following initial screening of the candidates a short-list of applicants will be interviewed by Board members and members of the senior staff, and we will encourage them to get involved with the Wikimedia community (if they aren’t already) to learn more about our movement. (We would also encourage anyone interested in the role to take a look at our guiding principles, or to pick up one of the books documenting and describing the Wikimedia movement.) We’ve set up some pages on meta wiki, the central collaboration wiki, where Wikimedia community members can find more information and also get involved in a public discussion about the role and the recruitment process. Thanks in advance for helping spread the word about this rare and important opportunity. Kat Walsh Chair, Board of Trustees, Wikimedia Foundation -- Jay Walsh Senior Director, Communications WikimediaFoundation.org blog.wikimedia.org +1 (415) 839 6885 x 6609, @jansonw _______________________________________________ Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more information about Wikimedia-l: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l _______________________________________________ WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list WikimediaAnnounce-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l

1 0

movement blog, not WMF blog, was: Go away, community (from WMF wiki at least)
by rupert THURNER 21 May '13

21 May '13

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Tomasz W. Kozlowski <tomasz(a)twkozlowski.net> wrote: > I'm not going to respond to all the points raised in your e-mail, Sue > (partially because most of them are just too general), so let me just > mentioned some of them. > >On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Sue Gardner <sgardner(a)wikimedia.org> wrote: >> The editors are responsible for the projects: the Wikimedia Foundation >> knows that, acknowledges it, and is deeply appreciative (as are all >> readers) for the work that volunteers do in the projects. The Wikimedia >> Foundation is responsible for the Wikimedia Foundation wiki (and the >> blog). > > Then it should perhaps be renamed as the Wikimedia Foundation Blog With > Guests Post from Community Members. uh ... i never noticed this. it seems really that WMF is considering blog.wikimedia.org as "their" personal blog. it even says "(This is a guest post by Carol Ann O’Hare of the French Wikimedia chapter.)" e.g. here: http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/05/10/wikimedia-france-research-award-winner/ while the domain http://www.wikimedia.org/ contents clearly states "Wikimedia is a global movement whose mission is to bring free educational content to the world." i would have expected a "movement blog" behind this URL, appropriate to the usage of the domain, but i am not sure if i am completely misreading this? rupert, wondering ...

15 33

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Go away, community (from WMF wiki at least)
by Gayle Karen Young 20 May '13

20 May '13

Hello folks, So... I caught bits of this while I was on layover between plane flights, so I've had time to have the multiple reactions that one has (nothing like an 11-hour flight to think about a situation). I've had time to feel defensive, insulted, opened, humbled, curious, thoughtful, regretful, optimistic... This is an earnest “I'm sorry, I'll do better” and I don't perfectly know what that looks like yet, because I (and I suspect like you) go from day to day within in a complex life trying to do the best I can. I'll respond more later, as I've got some scheduled time a way and like all human beings I need it, but will circle back when I return to work next Monday. I was thinking that I would be a very different person if I never made mistakes. :) In fact, contemplation of that is rather funny if any of you know me or the circumstances of my life. I could have done the process differently. I DO sometimes forget we're all on the same side. That's a darned shame. I do it sometimes because part of my job is to deal with how beleaguered some members (not all – I'm trying to find my way back to nuance and ask you to too) because sometimes they ask me for help, because I deal every day with burnout and chaos and challenging interpersonal dynamics, and I see some of the downright abusive messages that no person (staff or admin or user or each and any one of you reading this) should be subject to while pursuing work they love. (I also get to see some of the grateful messages, the way we support one another, not just tear people down. That part is /awesome/.) I find our staff and volunteers that I've worked with remarkable - people who I'm ridiculously grateful to work with and for. And I have no doubt that some of you have experienced staff (myself included) in ways I'm blind to, and I think there's room for all of us to get better. But I wish people could see how, even though it's our job, it can be sometimes just exhausting to try to please so many different voices. Some of you may think that the Foundation doesn't think about the community – and I think we sometimes listen so much that it's a little crazy because, as has been explained to us, the community is not one voice, not one thing, not one person. It's a vast, beautiful, sometimes conflicted, sometimes coordinated people working on this enormous shared endeavor. So it's not that community is not worth listening to, but how and where and to what pieces, and how do we get better at it and how do we amplify the constructive voices and not let deconstructive voices (both within the Foundation and without) tear us down because this work is hard. All our work is hard. I do appreciate the volunteers who have stepped and kept things going when I was personally at capacity. When I read that I need to remember just who pays my salary, I think a whole bunch of things (and have the various reactions I have, where both assume good faith that someone means that and I also look at the possibility that it was meant to be insulting and provoking). And at the end of the day, millions of people do and hundreds of thousands of editors help make that happen. I don't forget that. I do think that I am called to this role because on my best days, it uses me well – it uses my skills and knowledge and abilities in ways that I hope are good for the world. I am not anyone's servant (except perhaps for this cause), and I am deeply listening. So sometimes I forget we're on the same side, and thank you for reminding me. Thank you for the temperate voices, the ones who present a point of view I hadn't considered. As you can likely imagine, I hear more that way. Most people do. Someone mentioned that it's easier to lay good ground than to fix something in retrospect, and that most certainly is very, very true. :) (I really dislike that other people had to answer for me while I was out of commission - and my own fault for doing something on my to-do list the Friday before leaving town. Totally get that.) So...listening, thinking... also tired, but optimistic, and I hope and want to keep doing better. This definitely feels like a bit of trial by fire. Warmest regards, Gayle -- Gayle Karen K. Young Chief Talent and Culture Officer Wikimedia Foundation 415.310.8416 www.wikimediafoundation.org

43 70

[Wikimedia Announcements] Wikimedia Nederland monthly report for April
by Sandra Rientjes 20 May '13

20 May '13

April was a busy month for Wikimedia Nederland. Our report is available on meta: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_chapters/Reports/Wikimedia_Nederla… It is also included as text in this message. We have changed the structure of our monthly report to match our Annual Plan 2013 and our FDC application. COMMUNITY: supporting and mobilising volunteers and editors - Wikimedia Nederland Conferentie Preparations have begun for the annual Wikimedia Nederland Conference which will take place on November 2. One of the themes will be 'editor diversity' - we are cooperating with WMDE who will be holding an international event on that topic a week later on November 9. We are still looking for volunteers to take charge of programming and publicity. - Wikipedia Training National Museum of Ethnology A basic editing training was given to students and employees of the National Museum of Ethnology in Leiden by volunteers Erik Zachte, Hay Kranen and Boardmember Hans Muller.WORK: content, collaboration and activity development - WIki Loves Monuments The Wiki Loves Monuments team is preparing for the 2013 competition. This year, the focus will also be on municipal monuments and we are looking for funds to organise a combined Wiki Loves Monuments - editor training - publicity event in Den Haag. Wikimedia NL volunteer Els Arends published an article in the magazine 'Monumenten' about Wiki Loves Monuments, encouraging people to get involved. - Wikipedian in Residence at National Library and Archives The National Archives and National Library are going to hire a Wikipedian in Residence, a first for the Netherlands! This promises to be the start of a wider ranging cooperation between WMNL and these two national institutions. Focus of the cooperation will be improving content and recruiting editors. - CoSyne: final presentation to European Commission WMNL Board member Frans Grijzenhout attended the final presentation of the CoSyne <http://cosyne.eu/index.php/Main_Page> project to the European Commission in Luxembourg. WMNL's involvement was appreciated by the other partners in this project. - Wiki loves sound Wiki Loves Sound is a new initiative to promote use of sound in Wikimedia projects. In April, 1838 of the 2300+ sounds donated by The Netherlands Institute For Sound and Vision were uploaded to Commons and 50+ sounds were added to Wikipedia pages during an editathon. A Dutch spoken instructional video about adding sounds was made. - Wikivoyage Field research for Wikivoyage was carried out by students of the Nijenrode Business School. Reports and recommendations to be expected in May.WMNL: participation and support - The WMNL newsletter was distributed to members, donors and other interested parties. RESOURCES: Strong and sustainable financial position - Finalising Q1 report The first quarterly report following our FDC application was completed on time.GLOBAL: International collaboration *NB: reports by WMNL volunteers, board and staff who have attended international events can be found on the WMNL Wiki <http://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Internationaal>* - Milano Wikimedia Conference WMNL Chair Ziko van Dijk, Treasurer Ad Huikeshoven and Executive Director Sandra Rientjes attended the Milano Wikimedia Conference. WMNL volunteer Lodewijk was also there on behalf of the Wiki Loves Monuments International coordination group. - EU policy working group meeting On April 6 and 7, representatives of WM-chapters met in Brussels to discuss EU-policy affecting copyright and internet freedom. Lodewijk and Romaine represented WMNL. A full report<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/EU_Policy/Big_Fat_Brussels_Meeting/minutes> of the meeting is available on Meta. - GLAM-Wiki Volunteers Lodewijk, Romaine and Maarten attended the Glam WIki event in London, as did GLAM coordinator Sebastiaan ter Burg. - International Amsterdam Hackathon preparations Preparations for the International Hackathon picked up pace in April with the programme being finalised and arrangements made to support visa applications and travel. It is expected that 140 participants will gather in Amsterdam, May 24-26.ORGANISATION: board, management and support - Board retreat weekend 6-7 April Board and Executive Director attended a two-day meeting, following the Board elections in March. Topics on the agenda were: division of tasks within the Board, cooperation and communication, recruiting new volunteers. - Hiring part-time staff member for finances Tom Kisters will start work on May 1. He will work on finances and office management. Sandra Rientjes Directeur/Executive Director Wikimedia Nederland tel. (+31) (0)6 31786379 *Postadres*: * Bezoekadres:* Postbus 167 Mariaplaats 3 3500 AD Utrecht Utrecht _______________________________________________ Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. For more information about Wikimedia-l: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l _______________________________________________ WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list WikimediaAnnounce-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l

1 0

All the lakes in Sweden
by Anders Wennersten 19 May '13

19 May '13

A new major botgenerating effort is now under way on sv:wp. All lakes (30000, all down to ones of pondsizes with no name) is now produced based on lake data from Swedish metereology institute and all lake environment data from a newly set up authority demanded by EU, in order to register and track all data of lakes in all Europe. The articles are generated by AWB and with some manual effort to take care of text in existing articles and a major effort taking care of all with the same name (Little lake, Black lake etc) Examples http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96ren,_Sm%C3%A5land http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunn Also on maps from Google or Bing you can localize all lakes if you do not know the name (and for the ones missing name) https://maps.google.com/maps?q=http://toolserver.org/~para/cgi-bin/kmlexpor… or http://www.bing.com/maps/?mapurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftoolserver.org%2F%7Epara%2Fcg… As you can see the text is substantial around 5000 characters and even thing like fisharts in the lakes are generated from databases. We are now starting to contemplate to put these type of basedata in Wikidata (we are experimenting with this for some adm units), and to generate the articles from that as a base instead of from database extracted from the authorities and put on personal PCs We have excellent relations with involved authorities that are really happy with the result, and we are now being approached by other authorites who wants to follow and get their data from theirs databases used to generate qualified Wp articles (like all runestones, all archaeological excavations sites, all artworks placed on official grounds etc) Are there any other effort like this going on, especially if any one come further in establish links from authorities databased to wikidata? Anders

5 6

New Directory of Wikimedia Hong Kong
by Simon Shek 18 May '13

18 May '13

Dear all, On last Friday, Hong Kong seventy-seventh Wikimedia meetup, the 3rd Directory of Wikimedia Hong Kong was officially assembled and swore in. List of the new board as follows: Rover WONG President Ivy WONG Deputy President Vincent TSUI Secretary Tango CHAN Treasurer Alexander CHEUNG Director Raymond HUI Director The Directors are expected to serve a two-year term until 2015. -- Simon Shek 3rd Directory Electoral Affairs Committee, Wikimedia Hong Kong Wikimania 2013

1 0

Resignation announcement, and a parting remark to everyone
by Deryck Chan 18 May '13

18 May '13

Dear trusty Wikimedians, The FDC decisions are out on Sunday. Despite my desperate attempts to assist WMHK's board to keep up with deadlines and comply with seemingly endless requests from WMF grantmaking and FDC support staff, we received an overwhelmingly negative assessment which resulted in a complete rejection of our FDC proposal. At this point, I believe it's an appropriate time for me to announce my resignation and retirement from all my official Wikimedia roles - as Administrative Assistant and WCA Council Member of WMHK. I will carry out my remaining duties as a member of Wikimania 2013 local team. My experience with the FDC process, and the outcome of it, has convinced me that my continued involvement will simply be a waste of my own time, and of little benefit to WMHK and the Wikimedia movement as a whole. My experience with the FDC process has confirmed my ultimate scepticism about the WMF's direction of development. WMF has become so conservative with its strategies and so led into "mainstream" charity bureaucracy that it is no longer tending to the needs of the wider Wikimedia movement. My experience with the FDC process has shown me that WMF is expecting fully professional deliverables which require full-time professional staff to deliver, from organisations run by volunteers who are running Wikimedia chapters not because they're charity experts, but because they love Wikimedia. My experience with the FDC process has demonstrated to me that WMF is totally willing to perpetuate the hen-and-egg problem of the lack of staff manpower and watch promising initiatives dwindle into oblivion. WMHK isn't even a new chapter. We've been incorporated and recognised by WMF since 2007. Our hen-and-egg problem isn't new either. We've been vocal about the fact that our volunteer force is exhausted, and can't do any better without funding for paid staff and an office since 2010. Our request for office funding was rejected. The year after, our request to become a payment-processing chapter was rejected. The year after, we've got Wikimania (perhaps because WMF fortunately doesn't have too much to do with the bidding process), which gave us hope that we might finally be helped to professionalise. But it came to nothing - this very week our FDC request was rejected. And the reason? Every time the response from WMF was, effectively, we aren't good enough therefore we won't get help to do any better. We don't have professional staff to help us comply with the endless and ever-changing professional reporting criteria, therefore we can't be trusted to hire the staff to do precisely that. My dear friends and trusty Wikimedians, do you now understand the irony and the frustration? Wikimedia didn't start off as a traditional charity. It is precisely because of how revolutionary our mission and culture are, that we as a movement have reached where we are today. A few movement entities, particularly the WMF, managed to expand and take on the skin of a much more traditional charity. But most of us are still youthful Wikimedia enthusiasts who are well-versed with Wikimedia culture, but not with charity governance. Imposing a professional standard upon a movement entity as a prerequisite of giving it help to professionalise, is like judging toddlers by their full marathon times. Is this what we want Wikimedia to become? To turn from a revolutionary idea to a charity so conservative that it would rather perpetuate a chicken-and-egg problem than support long-awaited growth? I threw in days and days of effort in the last few years, often at the peril of my degree studies, with the wishful thinking that one day the help will come to let WMHK and all the other small but well-established chapters professionalise. I was wrong. With the FDC process hammering the final nail into my scepticism about where WMF and the movement is heading, I figured that with a degree in environmental engineering from Cambridge my life will be much better spent helping other worthy causes than wasting days on Wikimedia administration work only to have them go unappreciated time and time again. But I feel that it is necessary for me to leave a parting message to my fellow Wikimedians, a stern warning about where I see our movement heading. I feel that we're losing our character and losing our appreciation for volunteers, in particular the limitations of volunteer effort. I leave you all with a final thought from Dan Pallotta: charitable efforts will never grow if we continue to be so adverse about "overheads" and staffing. http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_pallotta_the_way_we_think_about_charity_is_dea… With Wiki-Love, Deryck PS. I wish there was an appropriate private mailing list for me to send this to. Unfortunately, most of the important WMF stakeholders aren't subscribed to internal-l, and most veteran chapters folks know what I want to say already. I just hope that trolls wouldn't blow this out of proportion. Or perhaps I do want this to be blown out of proportion so that my voice will actually be heard. Thanks for reading.

34 58

Hiring Community Liaisons (Contract)
by Howie Fung 18 May '13

18 May '13

* Hey all, For the last 18 months, the Engineering & Product Development department has been experimenting with the role of “Community Liaison, Product Development” - a staff member embedded in the Product team and tasked with factoring community concerns into our software development process, keeping editors informed about what we’re doing, and maintaining a dialogue between those who write code and those who write articles. While there is always room for improvement, I think this role has shown a lot of promise. We have a number of large projects coming down the pipeline (e.g., visual editor, discussion systems) and we need more help reaching out to our contributor communities, especially our non-English speaking projects, as our outreach there has traditionally been challenged. We’d like to recruit a small number of English-speaking or multilingual editors to do the Community Liaison job with different development teams and focuses. In particular we’re looking for people with a strong history of contributions to our projects who can provide sound and reasoned judgment and are trusted to do so by their community. Speaking other languages in addition to English is a major plus, as one of the objectives here is to ensure we can properly interact with and support non-English projects. I’ve included the full job description below. Our immediate need is for help with the Visual Editor. We’d like to hire a few community liaisons to help inform different Wikipedia language communities of the upcoming launch, create spaces for feedback and discussion, synthesize feedback for the Visual Editor team, and other activities required to support the Visual Editor launch later this year. If this is a role that would interest you, please e-mail Philippe Beaudette at pbeaudette(a)wikimedia.org<https://mail.google.com/mail/?view=cm&fs=1&tf=1&to=pbeaudette@wikimedia.org>. And if you know someone else who might fit the role, let them know about it :-). We’re provisionally interested in hiring 2-3 liaisons, at an hourly rate commensurate with experience. This can be a part-time role, but we’ll need at least 15 hours/week for the length of the engagement (minimum 3 months). Please do apply if you think it’s a role that suits you, and if you find places we haven’t notified, spread the word! Thanks. Howie * _________________________ Howie Fung Director of Product Development Wikimedia Foundation * Community Liaison Job Description Background Information and Statement of Purpose The Wikimedia Foundation’s Engineering & Product Development Department is looking at ways to more effectively incorporate broad community perspectives in decisions and hold dialogues with our editors about the scope, pace and features of upcoming changes to Wikimedia projects. As part of this, it is hiring additional Community Liaisons from our volunteer community. Scope of Work Support and improve our ongoing software development projects, in particular: - Building up a network of volunteers from both English language and non-English language wikis, increasing the number of projects we can interact with; - Engaging the community in the software development process, by acting as a conduit for community questions, bugs and and feature requests, talking to editors about our work and how they can participate in it effectively, and recruiting them for workgroups and studies; - Being available from time to time to provide expertise and knowledge about our projects, including but not limited to training externally-sourced staff in the way our projects work, answering their questions, and providing expert advice on an ad-hoc basis; - Ensuring that our community is represented in the decision-making process and that our planned software adequately reflects user needs; - Monitoring Wikimedia projects, with the assistance of a network of volunteers, for emerging issues that have an impact on Engineering programmes; and - Other duties as needed. Requirements Effective Community Liaisons will be: - Experienced users of Wikimedia projects, capable of representing our community within the Foundation and vice-versa. - Strong communicators (both verbally and with the written word), able to explain our products to different groups of users with different levels of technical understanding. - Able to focus on the larger picture, understanding which concerns and views are widespread and which are marginal or individual. - Approachable, as both users and product developers must be able to trust these people for the relationship to function. - Self-motivated - they will be given important projects and expected to execute with little to no supervision. - Strongly empathetic - they excel at understanding the perspectives of others and bridging the gap between different approaches to the world. - Willing and able to remain resilient in the face of frustration from our users, in order to get the job done. Pluses Other positive attributes or areas of knowledge include: - Diverse language skills. While the Wikimedia Foundation communicates internally in English, we aim to be able to talk to our different communities natively. - Experience with the software development process. You will be thrown into teams that are actively working on new features; having a background that reduces the slope of your learning curve is a plus. - Familiarity with multiple Wikimedia projects is a major plus; we are about more than just Wikipedia. *

2 2

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Wikimedia-l May 2013