Well, yeah. If the set up/transfer of images is feasable, it is. The tools for POTY were great.
Aubrey
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Lodewijk lodewijk@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
Hi,
another solution I've heard is setting up a special wiki for this (temporarily), using instant Commons to get all relevant images, and using the tools that they used for POTY.
Does that make any sense at all?
Lodewijk
2012/8/31 aude aude.wiki@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Peter Ekman pdekman@gmail.com wrote:
Nuno,
Thanks for the code. It looked promising, but unfortunately I'm not a programmer and the final product never arrived, and I think we'll have to "go manual" at this point.
To convert your system to our minimum requirements, we'd have to take your "single person" system and A. Randomly select, 50 or so photos, and have one person rate these, say 1-5. B. Store these results C. give a new screener another 50 or so photos, and store these results, and D. do this so 100,000 photos get rated at least 3 times each, then finally E. Average all the result for each pic.
We would need some more time to get this turned into a gadget and the toolserver has been a bit slow for the backend part. I am travelling so unfortunately can't finish with a gadget by today. :(
Anyway, I am not sure how practical it is to have ratings for 100,000 photos (each!) x 3 times, so I think we need a simplified process for the US.
I was thinking we'd have people nominate photos into another category or something. If there was a way to track which batch of photos have been looked through for nomination, that would be great, and not sure the best way (if any) to do that. Is this a good idea? can someone help set it up?
With a nominated set of photos (not sure how many), then a voting tool would be useful, and number of photos manageable.
Thoughts?
Cheers, Katie
Obviously some bells and whistles would have been nice, but that would have worked. Unfortunately it just never got that far.
If anybody can deliver that in working order before Sept. 10, please let me know!
Pete User:Smallbones
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:24:13 +0100 From: Nuno Tavares nuno.tavares@wikimedia.pt To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Automated voting/screening system Message-ID: 503FBDDD.2000107@wikimedia.pt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Peter,
Didn't our code help? Could you be more specific why the solution doesn't apply to you?
-NT
Em 29-08-2012 16:37, Peter Ekman escreveu:
It looks like WLM-US is having bad luck coming up with an automated voting/screening system to sort out the large number of photos we expect to have uploaded. Does anybody have any suggestions or technical solutions? Just to give the basics, I think WLM-US has to be prepared to screen 100,000 photos down to the 500 that the jury can deal with directly. That will likely take input from over 50 editors, e.g. the general logged in US population of editors, and take processing from early on in the contest while the contest is still running, e.g. before Sept. 10. Any help appreciated, Pete User:Smallbones
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
-- Board member, Wikimedia District of Columbia http://wikimediadc.org @wikimediadc / @wikimania2012
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org