To summarize, it's pretty clear: why the full list of 25 winners is not published in any referenceable way?
// M.A. Monjas
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:59 AM, ecemaml @ es.wikipedia ecemaml@gmail.com wrote:
We're a bunch of volunteers asking for and receiving a grant for running a professional contest. Although tweeting the full list of winner is definitely cool, it's not professional at all to have to refer to a tweet to state that I scored 20th, for instance.
// M.A. Monjas
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Nicu Buculei nicubunu@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, ecemaml @ es.wikipedia wrote:
Yes, using Twitter as the only means for publishing a contest result is really unprofessional :-(
We are not professionals here, but a bunch of volunteers in an open community. This is why I was bothered having communications first and foremost inside a walled garden (twitter) instead of our open community (Commons).
-- nicu :: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
-- Miguel-Ángel Monjas Discasto (formerly ecemaml) at Wikimedia projects: eswiki https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Discasto, cawiki https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Discasto, commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Discasto, wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Discasto, meta https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Discasto... Discasto at wikiexilio.org https://wikiexilio.org/wiki/User:Discasto