On 8 October 2012 17:12, Platonides wrote:
I'd split in October 2011-March 2012 and May-August 2012. The people who started photographing for WLM2012 in October should be a different bucket than those that noted that for their summer holidays.
Just did that, thanks for the suggestion.
It was. Email of 2011-11-19 by Lodewijk on this list. Although fun doesn't seem to have been an option in that survey.
Ah, looks like I forgot about this one, but I was mostly thinking about organised results (with graphs, etc.), not just about answers put into an Excel file; I can vaguely remember that there weren't too many volunteers to do that part of the job (which is understandable).
I would add a question about the way they uploaded their files:
Aren't we able to get this data without asking this question in the survey? I was under the impression that we can at least get a more-or-less correct number of UploadWizard uploads through the CatScan tool; I know it would also work for the VicunaUploader created by Yarl; not sure about Commonist and the old upload form.
Maybe even with a textarea for them to complain about our upload tools (in case they have errors).
I think we can use Q14 ("What was the main obstacle, if any, for you to participate in the competition? If you wish, you can elaborate in detail.") for that one.
Another question that I thought could be good was, "would you be willing to collborate organising WLM 2013 in your country?".
I think it was also suggested by Tamara on Etherpad today, so I guess the question has some merit (no offence Tamara!), but I am not entirely convinced we should use it. We already have contact information to Wikimedia user groups that organised WLM 2010, 2011, and 2012, and have also received contact information from a lot of people from countries that did not participate yet through the blog.