We've been using this tool to narrow down the pool of total photos to something smaller. http://toolserver.org/~kaldari/reviewer/
Right now it has helped select about 2500 photos from the more than 15,000 in the U.S. After the contest is over, Kaldari is going to reset it to review the ~2500+- photos and get an even smaller number that a group of WikiProject:National Register of Historic Places volunteers are going to narrow even further to ~500 photos to give to the jury.
At least that is the plan today. Maybe with Itzik's cool new tool we will change the plan :)
-Matthew
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Jason Spriggs jason@jasonspriggs.comwrote:
We do have a live version up but i believe Yan has a few things left he wants to add. I'll send out a second email with more details in a bit.
~Jason
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Bas vb basvb_wikipedia@live.nl wrote:
My answer would be: browse the categories and store the links (the prehistoric way) in wikiformat with 500px, so you can use the previewpage thing to watch them in a list on full scale together. This is the way I've done it the last 2 years, and a nice extra is that after the contest I could publish my lists with one click on the save button. See for example http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Basvb/100 and other subpages there. This way even years later you can look at the best pictures and nominate some for QI or FP if you want, or when you have the 11th article and want to use a picture other than one of the top 10 winners. So publishing a longlist for you country would be a real benefit.
Mvg,
Bas
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:25:42 +0200 From: itzik@infra.co.il To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Jury tools [2nd turn]
I hope tomorrow we can present the tool that we build and planning to use in Israel
- Sent from my mobile device
On Sep 29, 2012 5:44 PM, "Paul Selitskas" p.selitskas@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm in the very best way shocked by results of the almost finished Belarusian contest. That is more than 100 contestants with more than 5000 submissions! I'm very happy with great results in other countries as well.
But as the contest is going to its end, there is a question about the reviewing proccess. How should jury members pick the best photos? Which software tools should they use? I'm even thinking about developing a new one which would just retrieve photos via MWAPI and then just give the jury members a choice out of hundreds of photos (beforehand filtered to eliminate all low-quality, non-encyclopedic stuff).
Looking through the mailing list archives, especially the Jury tools thread, I haven't yet received an ultimate answer.
So, what is yours?
-- З павагай, Павел Селіцкас/Paul Selitskas Wizardist @ Wikimedia projects p.selitskas@gmail.com, +375257408304 Skype: p.selitskas
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
--
*Thank you for contacting Jason Spriggs.
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org