Hey Johnattan,
Typically, countries follow the official list - which will never be perfect. In some countries this is particularly sensitive, because it represents a specific period in the history.
There are a few approaches you could take, but none are real solutions. I would myself totally not be in favor of just 'adding monuments to the list'. Only in the case of a technical/clerical error, I would suggest to do that. But this sounds more like you disagree with the government on what the definition should be.
What they did in South Africa, if I recall correctly, was to create a separate list, where people could make suggestions for buildings to be recognised as monument - a list they would pass on to the government at the end of the competition. You could even ask people to submit photos for that, but those would - I think - be out of competition.
Best, Lodewijk
2016-08-17 10:35 GMT+02:00 Yaroslav M. Blanter putevod@mccme.ru:
Johnattan Rupire писал 2016-08-17 06:15:
HI all, What we can do with the monuments that aren't in the authorities list for low coverage from government? There are a decision about this from International team? some advices? I think here we have many monuments in many government list. How you do with these kind of monuments?
thanks!
Every team decides what they want to do. In Russia, for example, the official database is buggy and incomplete, and we are adding many monuments to the lists by hand (and also removing some which are included multiple times).
Cheers Yaroslav
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org