Re: [Gendergap] article for first women's political party in Pakistan is about to be deleted

Looking at the discussion, it seems they are using the wrong notability guideline, the first one, WP:COMPANY, which would be used for restaurants or garage bands, instead of WP:NONPROFIT <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28organizations_and_companies%29#Non-commercial_organizations>, further down the page. The page is rather confusing in the way it is organized, but I don't see any other category that could be used for political parties or organizations in the public interest. According to WP:NONPROFIT: *Non-commercial organizations* Organizations are usually notable if they meet *both* of the following standards: - The scope of their activities is national or international in scale - The organization has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization. So I have compiled a list of the Farsi-language sources at https://neotarf.wordpress.com/2017/06/29/sources-for- pakistan-women-muslim-league/ A total of 12 newspapers have published articles about Pakistan Women Muslim League, including an interview with the founder. There are 11 articles from Peshawar (local) sources, 2 from unidentified sources, and 3 articles from sources from the capital in Islamabad, showing national scope, as does the fact that the party is registered nationally. If there is not a consensus for an article, perhaps the information could be added to another article, I see there is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ List_of_political_parties_in_Pakistan#Minor_or_regional_parties although I suppose you would have to nominate all the other small parties for deletion as well, or incorporate them into the list. I really have to wonder if this is a good use of our time. While I appreciate Ryan's efforts in bringing this issue here, it took me literally hours to identify these articles to establish notability, on a topic that should already be obviously notable. Shouldn't anyone be able to go to Wikipedia to find information about another country's political system. On a similar note, I see The Womanity Foundation <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Womanity_Foundation> nominated for deletion and the person who started the article referred to as "an SPA". Welcome to Wikipedia. A quick google shows a huge number of reliable sources. https://www.google.com/search?q=The+Womanity+Foundation&ie= utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=The+Womanity+Foundation&tbm=nws Aren't they supposed to check that before they nominate it for deletion? Can the new community culture group help with that? On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Neotarf &lt;neotarf(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: