It might have been on purpose that there was no licensetpl_nonfree. The reason being, that even though that template looks like a license it isn't an actual license. Instead we use fair use rationale's, and these do have licensetpl_nonfree. However this specific file was not using the right template for machine recognizable fair use rationales.
Fixed in: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Odin_lloyd.jpg&diff=7765...
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <bjorsch@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Fako Berkers email@fakoberkers.nl wrote:
I'm running the tool algo-news and I discovered that this image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Odin_lloyd.jpg Is indicated as a free image in the API: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?format=json&prop= pageprops&action=query&redirects=1&pageids=39787564
Should I report this as a bug?
That feature uses the presence of a particular hidden <span> in the HTML of the page to determine non-freeness. On that particular image, the license template was missing that span,[1] and it also didn't use the standard non-free use rationale template[2] which also would have added the needed span.
Then null edits to the image and the page fixed things up.
[1]: Fixed in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Non- free_fair_use&diff=776553380&oldid=749836414 [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Non-free_use_rationale _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l