It might have been on purpose that there was no licensetpl_nonfree. The
reason being, that even though that template looks like a license it isn't
an actual license. Instead we use fair use rationale's, and these do
have licensetpl_nonfree. However this specific file was not using the right
template for machine recognizable fair use rationales.
Fixed in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Odin_lloyd.jpg&diff=776…
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Brad Jorsch (Anomie) <bjorsch(a)wikimedia.org
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Fako Berkers <email(a)fakoberkers.nl>
wrote:
>
> > I'm running the tool algo-news and I discovered that this image:
> >
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Odin_lloyd.jpg
> > Is indicated as a free image in the API:
> >
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?format=json&prop=
> > pageprops&action=query&redirects=1&pageids=39787564
> >
> > Should I report this as a bug?
>
>
> That feature uses the presence of a particular hidden <span> in the HTML of
> the page to determine non-freeness. On that particular image, the license
> template was missing that span,[1] and it also didn't use the standard
> non-free use rationale template[2] which also would have added the needed
> span.
>
> Then null edits to the image and the page fixed things up.
>
> [1]: Fixed in
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Non-
> free_fair_use&diff=776553380&oldid=749836414
> [2]:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Non-free_use_rationale
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>