Thank you for your reply. I have read the instruction and the blog of this project and have some ideas now. But there appears another question: What does the "reputation score" in the description refer to? Should we design it and make some metrics, or just use the existed scoring standard?
Sincerely, Li Linxuan
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Niharika Kohli";nkohli@wikimedia.org; 发送时间: 2016年3月21日(星期一) 晚上11:54 收件人: "Wikimedia developers"wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org;
主题: Re: [Wikitech-l] [GSoC 2016] Query about the ideas' project time
Hi Li,
On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 20:58 +0800, DJAKN wrote:
I am interested in the "Accuracy Review" project, but there is a note saying the estimated time for a senior contributor is 3 weeks. Other projects in the idea list have the similar estimated time. So should we complete more than one project during the three-month internship or just one?
A "senior contributor" here refers to someone who's been actively working with MediaWiki for a quite long time now. Typically, mentors for a project are the senior contributors. It's a yardstick we use to measure whether a project is big enough for GSoC.
Niharika Software Engineer (International) Wikimedia Foundation [User:NiharikaKohli] _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l