Thank you for your reply. I have read the instruction and the blog of this project and
have some ideas now. But there appears another question: What does the "reputation
score" in the description refer to? Should we design it and make some metrics, or
just use the existed scoring standard?
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Niharika Kohli";<nkohli(a)wikimedia.org>dia.org>;
发送时间: 2016年3月21日(星期一) 晚上11:54
收件人: "Wikimedia developers"<wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>dia.org>;
主题: Re: [Wikitech-l] [GSoC 2016] Query about the ideas' project time
On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 20:58 +0800, DJAKN wrote:
> I am interested in the "Accuracy
Review" project, but there is a note
> saying the estimated time for a senior contributor is 3 weeks. Other
> projects in the idea list have the similar estimated time. So should
> we complete more than one project during the three-month internship
> or just one?
A "senior contributor" here refers to someone who's been actively working
with MediaWiki for a quite long time now. Typically, mentors for a project
are the senior contributors. It's a yardstick we use to measure whether a
project is big enough for GSoC.
Software Engineer (International)
Wikitech-l mailing list