Brian Wolff wrote:
Well maybe they aren't explaining very good. This is a long thread, I think I've read most of it, its possible I've forgotten something, but
- I don't really recall anyone addressing the topic of why a committee
is better than the combined group of admins (For the record, I don't think the "admins" would work well for various reasons, I just don't see that its been discussed).
I agree that we should have a better and more thorough evaluation of enforcement options. A committee of three to five people is a specific potential solution, but from what I've read on the draft talk page and elsewhere, there hasn't been much discussion about alternate options.
Defining various options for enforcing a code of conduct besides having a committee and providing reasons for why these options are or are not feasible/available/best would be helpful, in my opinion. This might include surveying how other codes of conduct are enforced (or not), which some discussion participants have already made efforts to do.
MZMcBride