FYI, I’d be willing to maintain the extension, but it’d be best it there was one other
person, since it is WMF-deployed and thus I cannot merge my own patches.
--
Tyler Romeo
0x405D34A7C86B42DF
From: Quim Gil <qgil(a)wikimedia.org>
Reply: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>>
Date: July 23, 2014 at 7:57:07
To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>>
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Reviewing a couple of TorBlock patches
According to our algorithm (*), TorBlock currently has the worse track
reviewing code contributions -- even after Tim gave a -1 to one of the
three open patches last week (thanks!). There are two patches from Tyler
that haven't received any feedback at all since August 2013.
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:mediawiki/extensions…
Your help reviewing these patches is welcome.
It is not surprising that this extension has no maintaner listed at
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers (someone suggested
Tim in that table, he disagrees and edited accordingly).
Also, maybe someone is interested in maintaining this extension? Only
eleven patches submitted in the last 15 months.
(*)
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/gerrit_review_queue.html -- the
algorithm happens to be buggy these days, but apparently equally buggy for
all repos, which still results in some kind of justice.
--
Quim Gil
Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l