FYI, I’d be willing to maintain the extension, but it’d be best it there was one other person, since it is WMF-deployed and thus I cannot merge my own patches. --  Tyler Romeo 0x405D34A7C86B42DF From: Quim Gil <qgil(a)wikimedia.org> Reply: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>> Date: July 23, 2014 at 7:57:07 To: Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>> Subject:  [Wikitech-l] Reviewing a couple of TorBlock patches According to our algorithm (*), TorBlock currently has the worse track reviewing code contributions -- even after Tim gave a -1 to one of the three open patches last week (thanks!). There are two patches from Tyler that haven't received any feedback at all since August 2013. https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/status:open+project:mediawiki/extensions… Your help reviewing these patches is welcome. It is not surprising that this extension has no maintaner listed at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers (someone suggested Tim in that table, he disagrees and edited accordingly). Also, maybe someone is interested in maintaining this extension? Only eleven patches submitted in the last 15 months. (*) http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/gerrit_review_queue.html -- the algorithm happens to be buggy these days, but apparently equally buggy for all repos, which still results in some kind of justice. -- Quim Gil Engineering Community Manager @ Wikimedia Foundation http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Qgil _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l