On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Diederik van Liere dvanliere@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:11 PM, legoktm legoktm.wikipedia@gmail.comwrote:
Hi, Given that the Configuration cluster had the second most number of votes in the poll, why was it left of the agenda entirely?
We have been going back and forth between plenary session and breakout session for Configuration, it's definitely on the table and I am 99.9% sure that we will have a session dedicated to it. It's just not officially slotted anywhere right now but I will check with Robla and see how we will schedule this important cluster. It not being in the program right now should not be seen as a sign that's not important, on the contrary, we are just trying to find the most appropriate slot for it.
Let's put that number at 95% :-) I don't want to commit the group to anything; it's at the top of the short list, but you never know where people will want to take the conversation.
Legoktm, the thing you could do to push it over the top is to write up a summary as you see it of the various positions, and post it to this list. Ideally, you would also publish it as a subpage of the Architecture Summit 2014 page, similar to how some of the others are (e.g. HTML templating[1]) Even if we don't get to it at the summit, it still will be a very useful backgrounder to have. Is that something you'd be willing to chip in with?
Rob
[1] Example of the type of page we should have for all of the topics we're going to talk about: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_Summit_2014/HTML_templating