On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Diederik van Liere
<dvanliere(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:11 PM, legoktm
<legoktm.wikipedia(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
Hi,
Given that the Configuration cluster had the second most number of
votes in the poll, why was it left of the agenda entirely?
We have been going back and forth between plenary session and breakout
session for Configuration, it's definitely on the table and I am 99.9% sure
that we will have a session dedicated to it. It's just not officially
slotted anywhere right now but I will check with Robla and see how we will
schedule this important cluster.
It not being in the program right now should not be seen as a sign that's
not important, on the contrary, we are just trying to find the most
appropriate slot for it.
Let's put that number at 95% :-) I don't want to commit the group to
anything; it's at the top of the short list, but you never know where
people will want to take the conversation.
Legoktm, the thing you could do to push it over the top is to write up
a summary as you see it of the various positions, and post it to this
list. Ideally, you would also publish it as a subpage of the
Architecture Summit 2014 page, similar to how some of the others are
(e.g. HTML templating[1]) Even if we don't get to it at the summit,
it still will be a very useful backgrounder to have. Is that
something you'd be willing to chip in with?
Rob
[1] Example of the type of page we should have for all of the topics
we're going to talk about:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Architecture_Summit_2014/HTML_templating