Core API can be misleading since people may think other APIs are based on MW's API (i.e. It's core of other APIs) even though It's true in some cases but not necessarily for all.
Am I wrong?
Best
On 8/7/14, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:15 PM, James Forrester jdforrester@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, this is sensible. Let's certainly not call it "the MediaWiki API" given how many are planned.
"Core" seems a reasonable qualifier, though, no? Seems like the content API and a lot of other proposed interfaces are by definition outside the core. So why not MW core API or just core API for short?
-- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l