Core API can be misleading since people may think other APIs are based
on MW's API (i.e. It's core of other APIs) even though It's true in
some cases but not necessarily for all.
Am I wrong?
On 8/7/14, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:15 PM, James Forrester
Yes, this is sensible. Let's certainly not
call it "the MediaWiki API"
given how many are planned.
"Core" seems a reasonable qualifier, though, no? Seems like the
content API and a lot of other proposed interfaces are by definition
outside the core. So why not MW core API or just core API for short?
VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
Wikitech-l mailing list