On 3 March 2012 23:25, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 March 2012 22:44, John Du Hart compwhizii@gmail.com wrote:
I really don't understand why we'd rather suffer than use a superior proprietary product.
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Values Duplicability down to the infrastructure is considered extremely important, or the free content isn't free. "Open core" fails this test.
(I will note that the Foundation has used nonfree software in infrastructure, e.g. Java before it was freed, Solaris 10 - but only on the way to something free.)
- d.